This map shows the geographic impact of Wing Suen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wing Suen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wing Suen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wing Suen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wing Suen. The network helps show where Wing Suen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wing Suen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wing Suen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wing Suen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wing Suen. Wing Suen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Suen, Wing, Eugene Silberberg, & Paul Tseng. (2001). The Lechatelier Principle: The Long and the Short of it. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
16.
Suen, Wing. (2000). A Competitive Theory of Equilibrium and Disequilibrium Unravelling in Two-Sided Matching. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Lui, Hon‐Kwong & Wing Suen. (1995). The efficient marriage market hypothesis : a direct test. Digital Commons - Lingnan (Lingnan University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.