This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Opstelten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Opstelten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Opstelten more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Opstelten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Opstelten. The network helps show where Wim Opstelten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim Opstelten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim Opstelten.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim Opstelten based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Wim Opstelten. Wim Opstelten is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Opstelten, Wim, Jochen Cals, & Henriëtte E. van der Horst. (2020). [General Practice: continuously developing].. PubMed. 163.2 indexed citations
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2017). [The Dutch College of General Practitioners practice guideline 'Suspicious skin lesions'].. PubMed. 161. D1897–D1897.3 indexed citations
4.
Opstelten, Wim, Patrick Bindels, & Jako Burgers. (2017). [Research in the GP's practice is good for the health of all].. PubMed. 161. D1996–D1996.2 indexed citations
5.
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2017). [Revision of the Dutch College of General Practitioners practice guideline 'Children with fever'].. PubMed. 161. D1199–D1199.
6.
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2016). Verminderde afweer : Risicogroepen en gevolgen voor de huisartsenpraktijk. Nederlandsch tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde/NTvG-databank. 160(22).
7.
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2015). [The NHG practice guideline 'Head injury'].. PubMed. 159. A8992–A8992.2 indexed citations
8.
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2015). [Revision of the Dutch College of General Practitioners practice guideline 'Acute sore throat'].. PubMed. 159. A9456–A9456.12 indexed citations
9.
Blanker, Marco H., et al.. (2014). [Changes to Dutch College of General Practitioners guideline 'Micturition problems in men'].. PubMed. 158. A8070–A8070.4 indexed citations
10.
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2014). [The Dutch College of General Practitioners practice guideline 'Eczema'].. PubMed. 158. A8009–A8009.3 indexed citations
Blanker, Marco H., et al.. (2013). [Summary of the NHG practice guideline 'Lower urinary tract symptoms in men'].. PubMed. 157(18). A6178–A6178.13 indexed citations
13.
Opstelten, Wim & A N Goudswaard. (2012). [Revised practice guideline on mild traumatic head/brain injury: mainly for secondary care].. PubMed. 156(4). A4474–A4474.2 indexed citations
14.
Hartwig, Nico G., et al.. (2011). [Summary of the multidisciplinary guideline 'Varicella'].. PubMed. 155(51). A3511–A3511.
15.
Opstelten, Wim, Just Eekhof, & Arie Knuistingh Neven. (2011). [Childhood diseases with exanthema].. PubMed. 155(41). A3671–A3671.2 indexed citations
16.
Opstelten, Wim, Stefan Visscher, & Jan van Lieshout. (2009). A chat about CHADS. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 52(13). 625–625.1 indexed citations
17.
Opstelten, Wim, et al.. (2007). Herpes labialis. Huisarts en Wetenschap. 50(8). 602–605.
Scholten, R. J. P. M., et al.. (2001). The accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing meniscal lesions of the knee: a meta-analysis.. PubMed. 50(11). 938–44.48 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.