Wim Koops

561 total citations
8 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Wim Koops is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Wim Koops has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Wim Koops's work include Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (1 paper). Wim Koops is often cited by papers focused on Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (1 paper) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (1 paper). Wim Koops collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and United States. Wim Koops's co-authors include Robert Kröger, Arjen J. Witkamp, Serge van Ruth, Eelco de Bree, F.A.N. Zoetmulder, Marcel van Herk, Harry Bartelink, A. Touw, Ronald B. Keus and S.H. Muller and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, International Journal of Cancer and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

Wim Koops

7 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Wim Koops Netherlands	7	223	127	118	112	88	8	410
J. C. Zhu Australia	8	302 1.4×	50 0.4×	81 0.7×	100 0.9×	278 3.2×	11	552
Poompis Pattaranutaporn Thailand	10	115 0.5×	57 0.4×	28 0.2×	19 0.2×	80 0.9×	29	336
Luke Bonello Italy	14	101 0.5×	291 2.3×	12 0.1×	47 0.4×	155 1.8×	19	485
Hiroyuki Horikoshi Japan	13	101 0.5×	366 2.9×	58 0.5×	28 0.3×	164 1.9×	34	549
Anna C. Pfannenberg Germany	8	91 0.4×	315 2.5×	6 0.1×	35 0.3×	136 1.5×	12	466
A.I. Ghanem United States	11	58 0.3×	175 1.4×	3 0.0×	55 0.5×	95 1.1×	56	390
Thomas Winkens Germany	14	144 0.6×	288 2.3×	6 0.1×	13 0.1×	100 1.1×	76	579
Patrick Veit Germany	11	69 0.3×	280 2.2×	4 0.0×	53 0.5×	157 1.8×	14	433
Ivan Ho Shon Australia	13	142 0.6×	228 1.8×	13 0.1×	6 0.1×	173 2.0×	31	404
Audrey Cook United Kingdom	10	130 0.6×	95 0.7×	3 0.0×	18 0.2×	67 0.8×	15	305

Countries citing papers authored by Wim Koops

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Koops's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Koops with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Koops more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wim Koops

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Koops. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Koops. The network helps show where Wim Koops may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim Koops

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim Koops. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim Koops based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wim Koops. Wim Koops is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Jong, Daphne de, et al.. (2010). Oncogenesis and classification of mixed‐type liposarcoma: A radiological, histopathological and molecular biological analysis. International Journal of Cancer. 128(4). 778–786. 9 indexed citations

2.

Buckle, Tessa, P. Chin, Nynke S. van den Berg, et al.. (2010). Tumor bracketing and safety margin estimation using multimodal marker seeds: a proof of concept. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 15(5). 56021–56021. 18 indexed citations

3.

Koops, Wim, et al.. (2008). An Unusual Case of Hemosiderotic Fibrohistiocytic Lipomatous Lesion: Correlation of MRI and Pathologic Findings. Sarcoma. 2008. 1–4. 6 indexed citations

4.

Bree, Eelco de, Wim Koops, Robert Kröger, et al.. (2004). Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal or appendiceal origin: Correlation of preoperative CT with intraoperative findings and evaluation of interobserver agreement. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 86(2). 64–73. 206 indexed citations

5.

Rasch, C., Ronald B. Keus, Frank A. Pameijer, et al.. (1997). The potential impact of CT-MRI matching on tumor volume delineation in advanced head and neck cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 39(4). 841–848. 127 indexed citations

6.

Taal, Babs G., et al.. (1997). Potential risks and artifacts of magnetic resonance imaging of self-expandable esophageal stents. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 46(5). 424–429. 25 indexed citations

7.

Vries, Hendrik de, et al.. (1996). Hendrik de Vries : 1896-1989. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

8.

Treurniet, Frank E.E., et al.. (1995). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in endometrial carcinoma; preoperative estimation of depth of myometrial invasion. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 74(10). 827–831. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact