Journal of Biomedical Optics

6.9k papers and 195.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.9k papers published in Journal of Biomedical Optics in the last decades have received a total of 195.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Biomedical Optics usually cover Biomedical Engineering (4.2k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (3.1k papers) and Biophysics (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (2.4k papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (2.2k papers) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Biomedical Optics are Lihong V. Wang, Barry R. Masters, Ben Cox, Brian W. Pogue, Bradley E. Treeby, Baowei Fei, Guolan Lu, David A. Boas, Valery V. Tuchin and Ruikang K. Wang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Biomedical Optics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Biomedical Optics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Biomedical Optics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Biomedical Optics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Biomedical Optics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Biomedical Optics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Biomedical Optics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025