Wim Kalmijn

426 total citations
13 papers, 264 citations indexed

About

Wim Kalmijn is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Wim Kalmijn has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 264 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Social Psychology, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Wim Kalmijn's work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). Wim Kalmijn is often cited by papers focused on Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (5 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). Wim Kalmijn collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and South Africa. Wim Kalmijn's co-authors include Ruut Veenhoven and Lidia R. Arends and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Indicators Research, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) and Journal of Happiness Studies.

In The Last Decade

Wim Kalmijn

13 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

Wim Kalmijn

SP

SPS

HEALT

GHP

ECP

Caspar Kaiser United Kingdom

Eduardo Wills Herrera Colombia

Sarah C. Dahmann Australia

Nathan Kettlewell Australia

Kelsey J. O’Connor Germany

Leonie C. Steckermeier Germany

Chenhong Peng Hong Kong

Alan Piper Germany

Sufei Xin China

Caspar Kaiser United Kingdom

Wim Kalmijn

109 ×0.6

SP

78 ×0.6

SPS

91 ×1.1

HEALT

71 ×2.3

GHP

20 ×0.6

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Wim Kalmijn Wim Kalmijn (= 1×) peers Caspar Kaiser

Countries citing papers authored by Wim Kalmijn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wim Kalmijn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wim Kalmijn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wim Kalmijn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wim Kalmijn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wim Kalmijn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wim Kalmijn. The network helps show where Wim Kalmijn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wim Kalmijn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wim Kalmijn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wim Kalmijn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wim Kalmijn. Wim Kalmijn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Veenhoven, Ruut, et al.. (2017). Diversity in Survey Questions on the Same Topic. 4 indexed citations

2.

Veenhoven, Ruut, et al.. (2015). Pooling Time Series Based on Slightly Different Questions About the Same Topic Forty Years of Survey Research on Happiness and Life Satisfaction in The Netherlands. Social Indicators Research. 126(2). 863–891. 13 indexed citations

3.

Veenhoven, Ruut, et al.. (2015). Conversion of Verbal Response Scales: Robustness Across Demographic Categories. Social Indicators Research. 126(1). 331–358. 3 indexed citations

4.

Kalmijn, Wim, et al.. (2014). Stability of Boundaries Between Response Options of Response Scales: Does ‘Very Happy’ Remain Equally Happy over the Years?. Social Indicators Research. 123(1). 241–266. 3 indexed citations

5.

Kalmijn, Wim & Ruut Veenhoven. (2013). Index of Inequality-Adjusted Happiness (IAH) Improved: A Research Note. Journal of Happiness Studies. 15(6). 1259–1265. 5 indexed citations

6.

Kalmijn, Wim. (2011). From Discrete 1 to 10 Towards Continuous 0 to 10: The Continuum Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Happiness in a Nation. Social Indicators Research. 110(2). 549–557. 12 indexed citations

7.

Kalmijn, Wim. (2011). Happiness is not normally distributed: A comment to Delhey and Kohler. Social Science Research. 41(1). 199–202. 7 indexed citations

8.

Kalmijn, Wim & Lidia R. Arends. (2010). Measures of Inequality: Application to Happiness in Nations. Social Indicators Research. 99(1). 147–162. 19 indexed citations

9.

Kalmijn, Wim. (2010). Quantification of Happiness Inequality. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 9 indexed citations

10.

Kalmijn, Wim, Lidia R. Arends, & Ruut Veenhoven. (2010). Happiness Scale Interval Study. Methodological Considerations. Social Indicators Research. 102(3). 497–515. 30 indexed citations

11.

Kalmijn, Wim & Ruut Veenhoven. (2005). Measuring Inequality of Happiness in Nations: In Search for Proper Statistics. Journal of Happiness Studies. 6(4). 357–396. 115 indexed citations

12.

Veenhoven, Ruut & Wim Kalmijn. (2005). Inequality-Adjusted Happiness in Nations Egalitarianism and Utilitarianism Married in a New Index of Societal Performance. Journal of Happiness Studies. 6(4). 421–455. 43 indexed citations

13.

Kalmijn, Wim. (1976). Simultaneous Confidence Regions for Repeat Preference Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics). 25(2). 117–117. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact