William W. Hung

43 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

William W. Hung
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 161
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 32
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 94
  • Emergency Medicine 81
  • Family Practice 16
Replace Jan Busby‐Whitehead with:
Jan Busby‐Whitehead United States
David M. Smith United States
Mieke Deschodt Belgium
Ulrich Thiem Germany
Katarzyna Szczerbińska Poland
Regina Roller‐Wirnsberger Austria
D. Gwyn Seymour United Kingdom
Alain Colvez France
Andrew R. Zullo United States
Hilary Siebens United States
William W. Hung relative to Jan Busby‐Whitehead United States Jan Busby‐Whitehead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jan Busby‐Whitehead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William W. Hung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William W. Hung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William W. Hung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William W. Hung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William W. Hung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William W. Hung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William W. Hung. The network helps show where William W. Hung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William W. Hung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William W. Hung Line = papers co-authored together William W. Hung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011268
2 2012174
3 2009160
4 201974
5 201271
6 202064
7 199958
8 202252
9 201345
10 201738
11 201336
12 201534
13 202131
14 201530
15 202226
16 201723
17 201619
18 202018
19 201417
20 201617

About William W. Hung

William W. Hung is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (7 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (161 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (32 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (94 citations), Emergency Medicine (81 citations) and Family Practice (16 citations). William W. Hung has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Albert L. Siu, Joseph S. Ross, Kenneth S. Boockvar, Joseph D. Zuckerman, Kenneth A. Egol, Juan P. Wisnivesky, Kathryn Nearing, Camilla B. Pimentel, Hillary D. Lum and Cari Levy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Innovation in Aging, Academic Emergency Medicine, BMC Geriatrics and Clinical Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact