William T. O'Day

14 total papers · 554 total citations
12 papers, 440 citations indexed

About

William T. O'Day is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, William T. O'Day has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 440 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in William T. O'Day's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers). William T. O'Day is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers) and bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers). William T. O'Day collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Czechia. William T. O'Day's co-authors include Richard W. Young, Dean Bok, Héctor R. Fernández, David E. Ong, James Davis, Enrique Rodríguez-Boulan, Bruce A. Pfeffer, John G. Flannery, Austin K. Mircheff and Sheldon S. Miller and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Biochemistry and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

William T. O'Day

12 papers receiving 413 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William T. O'Day 351 147 86 68 66 12 440
D. Howard Dickson 334 1.0× 227 1.5× 44 0.5× 83 1.2× 30 0.5× 30 414
S. Vallerga 322 0.9× 254 1.7× 32 0.4× 22 0.3× 62 0.9× 21 423
Kaspar P. Mueller 231 0.7× 98 0.7× 26 0.3× 268 3.9× 58 0.9× 13 456
Keely M. Bumsted O’Brien 279 0.8× 133 0.9× 121 1.4× 39 0.6× 14 0.2× 10 371
Barbara Nagle 309 0.9× 99 0.7× 18 0.2× 178 2.6× 16 0.2× 8 404
Susana Ferreiro‐Galve 356 1.0× 87 0.6× 25 0.3× 113 1.7× 113 1.7× 19 420
Tetsuo Kon 224 0.6× 51 0.3× 29 0.3× 72 1.1× 23 0.3× 22 401
Yuri V. Makhankov 329 0.9× 161 1.1× 33 0.4× 250 3.7× 14 0.2× 8 469
Joseph R. Koke 182 0.5× 91 0.6× 28 0.3× 57 0.8× 22 0.3× 16 403
Chi Cheng 361 1.0× 82 0.6× 15 0.2× 96 1.4× 10 0.2× 19 448

Countries citing papers authored by William T. O'Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William T. O'Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William T. O'Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William T. O'Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William T. O'Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William T. O'Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William T. O'Day. The network helps show where William T. O'Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William T. O'Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William T. O'Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William T. O'Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William T. O'Day. William T. O'Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026