A. Peter M. Heintz
- Surgery top 1%
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.2%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.1%
- Rheumatology top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ben W. MolC. Huub van der VaartH. Jorien van BrummenPiet C. ScholtenF. P. H. L. J. DijkhuizenGeerte van de PolHein W. BruinseC A H Janssen
- Topics
- Pelvic floor disorders treatments (29 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (28 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyItaly
In The Last Decade
A. Peter M. Heintz
138 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Surgery 2.4k
- Reproductive Medicine 2.2k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 2.1k
- Rheumatology 1.4k
- Epidemiology 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by A. Peter M. Heintz
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Peter M. Heintz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Peter M. Heintz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Peter M. Heintz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Peter M. Heintz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Peter M. Heintz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Peter M. Heintz. The network helps show where A. Peter M. Heintz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Peter M. Heintz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Peter M. Heintz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Peter M. Heintz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Peter M. Heintz. A. Peter M. Heintz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 108 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | 137 | |
| 13 | Carcinoma of the vulva. | 23 |
| 14 | Carcinoma of the ovary. | 146 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 150 |
About A. Peter M. Heintz
A. Peter M. Heintz is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 140 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic floor disorders treatments (29 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (28 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.1k citations), Reproductive Medicine (2.2k citations) and Rheumatology (1.4k citations). A. Peter M. Heintz has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ben W. Mol, C. Huub van der Vaart, H. Jorien van Brummen, Piet C. Scholten, F. P. H. L. J. Dijkhuizen, Geerte van de Pol, Hein W. Bruinse, C A H Janssen, J.R.J. de Leeuw and Johanna G. van der Bom. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.