Michael Conner

2.8k citations
72 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 23

Michael Conner

69 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Michael Conner
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 448
  • Reproductive Medicine 465
  • Oncology 521
  • Cancer Research 236
  • Microbiology 88
Replace Ryo Konno with:
Ryo Konno Japan
Amin Makar Belgium
Soon Beom Kang South Korea
Vera Loizzi Italy
Marianne Waldstrøm Denmark
Benjamin Piura Israel
Jay W. Carlson United States
Elke A. Jarboe United States
Takuma Fujii Japan
Pincas Bitterman United States
Michael Conner relative to Ryo Konno Japan Ryo Konno's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Ryo Konno · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Conner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Conner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Conner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Conner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Conner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Conner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Conner. The network helps show where Michael Conner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Conner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Conner Line = papers co-authored together Michael Conner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202013
2 201921
3 20168
4
Negotiating Migration and Violence in the Pre-Columbian Mid-Continent: A View from the Village
20151
5 201472
6 20148
7 2013203
8 201251
9 20109
10 200928
11 20078
12 20063
13 200662
14 20064
15 20067
16 2006127
17 20045
18
The efficacy of 9-cis-retinoic acid (aliretinoin) as a chemopreventive agent for cervical dysplasia: results of a randomized double-blind clinical trial.
200338
19 200149
20 199918

About Michael Conner

Michael Conner is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Microbiology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (14 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (7 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (7 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (7 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (5 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (448 citations), Reproductive Medicine (465 citations) and Oncology (521 citations). Michael Conner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Lithuania. Frequent co-authors include Charles N. Landen, Britt Erickson, J. Michael Straughn, Warner K. Huh, Ronald D. Alvarez, Rodney P. Rocconi, Lea Novak, Mack N. Barnes, John C. Hauth and Suzanne Cliver. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026