William Strieder

963 citations
76 papers · 799 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

William Strieder

76 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

William Strieder
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Computational Mechanics 203
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 4
  • Condensed Matter Physics 85
  • Mathematical Physics 62
  • Applied Mathematics 64
Replace Jürgen Fuhrmann with:
Jürgen Fuhrmann Germany
Vladimír Hlaváček United States
In Chan Kim United States
Isaak Rubinstein Israel
Sebastián C. Reyes United States
Lihua Shen China
J. G. Oldroyd United Kingdom
Harold L. Weissberg United States
Julien Michels Switzerland
B. Le Neindre France
William Strieder relative to Jürgen Fuhrmann Germany Jürgen Fuhrmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jürgen Fuhrmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Strieder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Strieder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Strieder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Strieder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Strieder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Strieder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Strieder. The network helps show where William Strieder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside William Strieder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Strieder Line = papers co-authored together William Strieder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197371
2 198661
3 199052
4 197751
5 200235
6 196834
7 198220
8 198019
9 199819
10 197919
11 198719
12 199818
13 200316
14 200015
15 196715
16 197115
17 200414
18 197113
19 198213
20 198512

About William Strieder

William Strieder is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, Applied Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 76 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media (12 papers), Radiative Heat Transfer Studies (12 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (11 papers), Composite Material Mechanics (10 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (8 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (7 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (6 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (203 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (4 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (85 citations), Mathematical Physics (62 citations) and Applied Mathematics (64 citations). William Strieder has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Dah‐Shyang Tsai, Rutherford Aris, Arvind Varma, Stephen Prager, Li‐Shi Luo, Dewei Qi, Xiangning Li, F. H. Verhoff, Giacomo Cao and Mónica C. Regalbuto. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Engineering Science, AIChE Journal, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research and International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact