William Simpson

1.8k citations
56 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

William Simpson

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Clinical Psychology 419
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 219
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 166
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
  • Pharmacy 52
Replace Sohye Kim with:
Sohye Kim United States
Peter Reaburn Australia
Samuel F. Mikail Canada
Lee Berk United States
Luciana Tovo‐Rodrigues Brazil
Marion Tegethoff Switzerland
Sabine J. Roza Netherlands
Kristin Voegtline United States
Maria De Agostini France
Neil J. McLean Australia
William Simpson relative to Sohye Kim United States Sohye Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sohye Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Simpson. The network helps show where William Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Simpson Line = papers co-authored together William Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Gastric bypass revision: lessons learned from 920 cases.
1988146
2 2014141
3 201495
4 202189
5 202089
6 201653
7 201048
8 201944
9 201239
10 202139
11 201439
12 196931
13 196129
14 201623
15 199220
16 201420
17 201216
18 199215
19 195515
20 197914

About William Simpson

William Simpson is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (419 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (219 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (166 citations), Biological Psychiatry (31 citations) and Pharmacy (52 citations). William Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Beth Patterson, Michael Van Ameringen, Meir Steiner, Benício N. Frey, Richard W. Schwartz, William E. Strodel, Ward O. Griffen, Jessica Robin, Liam D. Kaufman and Jasmine Turna. Their work appears in journals such as Depression and Anxiety, Psychiatric Services, Nature, Psychiatry Research and Textile Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026