William Schmitt

23 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

William Schmitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 186
  • Algebra and Number Theory 141
  • Geometry and Topology 179
  • Mathematical Physics 66
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 102
Replace Eric Babson with:
Eric Babson United States
Marta Casanellas Spain
Maurice Pouzet France
Greta Panova United States
Peter M. Higgins United Kingdom
David B. Bernstein United States
Elisa Pergola Italy
E. F. Robertson United Kingdom
Sergey Kitaev United Kingdom
Philip J. Hanlon United States
William Schmitt relative to Eric Babson United States Eric Babson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Eric Babson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Schmitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Schmitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Schmitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Schmitt. The network helps show where William Schmitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside William Schmitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Schmitt Line = papers co-authored together William Schmitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002117
2 199492
3 200286
4 199476
5 198743
6 199125
7 199320
8 199518
9 200417
10 200416
11 200515
12 19908
13 19985
14 20075
15 20234
16 20064
17 20004
18 19904
19 19992
20 20112

About William Schmitt

William Schmitt is a scholar working on Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology and Molecular Biology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (10 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (7 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (6 papers), Advanced Graph Theory Research (5 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (3 papers), semigroups and automata theory (3 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (186 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (141 citations), Geometry and Topology (179 citations), Mathematical Physics (66 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (102 citations). William Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Waterman, Jatin Misra, Gregory Stephanopoulos, Henry Crapo, George Stephanopoulos, S. R. Gullans, Daehee Hwang, Li-Li Hsiao, Ryan T. Gill and Gaspar Taroncher‐Oldenburg. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A, European Journal of Combinatorics, Advances in Applied Mathematics and Discrete Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact