William Rodemer

465 citations
17 papers · 327 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

William Rodemer

15 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

William Rodemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Developmental Neuroscience 58
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 153
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 106
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 69
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 53
Replace Philip H. Iffland with:
Philip H. Iffland United States
Benoît Jenny Switzerland
Lorenzo De Santi Italy
Harald Stefanits Austria
Qiyue Deng China
Michele Zeinieh Lebanon
Sachiyo Misumi Japan
Tamaki Iwase Japan
Benedikte Wanscher Denmark
Cosima Fonte France
William Rodemer relative to Philip H. Iffland United States Philip H. Iffland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Philip H. Iffland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Rodemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Rodemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Rodemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Rodemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Rodemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Rodemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Rodemer. The network helps show where William Rodemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside William Rodemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Rodemer Line = papers co-authored together William Rodemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011115
2 201643
3 201827
4 202124
5 202018
6 201616
7 201515
8 201413
9 201911
10 201810
11 201810
12 20229
13 20208
14 20206
15 20232
16 20240
17 20250

About William Rodemer

William Rodemer is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (13 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (9 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers) and Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (58 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (153 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (106 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (69 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (53 citations). William Rodemer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Selzer, Jianli Hu, Guixin Zhang, John R. Pollard, Jacqueline A. French, W. Allen Hauser, Brian C. Callaghan, Dale C. Hesdorffer, Michael I. Shifman and Shuxin Li. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Epilepsia, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience and Alzheimer s & Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact