Countries citing papers authored by William Proctor
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Proctor more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Proctor. The network helps show where William Proctor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Proctor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Proctor.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Proctor based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Proctor. William Proctor is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Freeman, M. & William Proctor. (2018). Global convergence cultures: transmedia earth. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).2 indexed citations
6.
Proctor, William. (2018). ‘I’ve seen a lot of talk about the #blackstormtrooper outrage, but not a single example of anyone complaining’: The Force Awakens, canonical fidelity and non-toxic fan practices. Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University).1 indexed citations
Proctor, William, et al.. (2016). Exploring Imaginary Worlds: Audiences, fan cultures, and geographies of the imagination. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 13(1). 479–487.1 indexed citations
9.
Proctor, William. (2000). The Gospel According to the New York Times: How the World's Most Powerful News Organization Shapes Your Mind and Values.1 indexed citations
10.
Podell, Richard N. & William Proctor. (1995). When your doctor doesn't know best : medical mistakes that even the best doctors make--and how to protect yourself. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
11.
Proctor, William, et al.. (1989). Kids who have too much.2 indexed citations
12.
Proctor, William, et al.. (1988). The Self-Confident Child. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
13.
Gallup, George, Alec M. Gallup, & William Proctor. (1986). The Great American Success Story: Factors That Affect Achievement. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
14.
Benson, Herbert & William Proctor. (1986). La relajación: una terapia imprescindible para mejorar su salud. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
15.
Gallup, George & William Proctor. (1984). Adventures in immortality.41 indexed citations
16.
Proctor, William, et al.. (1984). The Ethical Executive: A Top C.E.O.'s Program for Success With Integrity in the Corporate World.1 indexed citations
17.
Gallup, George & William Proctor. (1984). Forecast 2000: George Gallup, Jr., Predicts the Future of America. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).2 indexed citations
Worden, J. William & William Proctor. (1976). PDA--personal death awareness. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).7 indexed citations
20.
Proctor, William, et al.. (1976). Women in the Pulpit: Is God an Equal Opportunity Employer?.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.