William Petrcich
Impact in
- Internal Medicine top 5%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Family Practice top 10%
Papers in
-
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 3
- Co-authors
- Marc CarrierGrégoire Le GalManish M. SoodDar DowlatshahiMatthew D. F. McInnesAmit X. GargAurélien DellucThomas Tran
- Journals
- Radiology (3 papers)Thrombosis Research (3 papers)Stroke (3 papers)PLoS ONE (3 papers)JAMA Network Open (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
William Petrcich
39 papers receiving 970 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Internal Medicine 68
- Family Practice 34
- Neurology 195
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 249
- Health Informatics 11
Countries citing papers authored by William Petrcich
This map shows the geographic impact of William Petrcich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Petrcich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Petrcich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Petrcich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Petrcich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Petrcich. The network helps show where William Petrcich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Petrcich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 99 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 73 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 80 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 53 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 50 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 22 |
About William Petrcich
William Petrcich is a scholar working on Internal Medicine, Family Practice, Hematology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 40 papers that have together received 984 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers), Neurosurgical Procedures and Complications (3 papers), Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (3 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (68 citations), Family Practice (34 citations), Neurology (195 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (249 citations) and Health Informatics (11 citations). William Petrcich has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marc Carrier, Grégoire Le Gal, Manish M. Sood, Dar Dowlatshahi, Matthew D. F. McInnes, Amit X. Garg, Aurélien Delluc, Thomas Tran, Andrew M. Demchuk and Richard I. Aviv. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, Thrombosis Research, Stroke, PLoS ONE and JAMA Network Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.