William P. Tucker
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Carol R. KeplerS.B. ToveH. Robert HortonG. FarrellP.J. McNultyRichard G. HiskeyArthur RoeP. A. Stampe
- Topics
- Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (4 papers)Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers)Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological ChemistryThe Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
William P. Tucker
26 papers receiving 455 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Molecular Biology 144
- Nutrition and Dietetics 116
- Organic Chemistry 107
- Biochemistry 92
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 78
Countries citing papers authored by William P. Tucker
This map shows the geographic impact of William P. Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William P. Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William P. Tucker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William P. Tucker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William P. Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William P. Tucker. The network helps show where William P. Tucker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William P. Tucker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William P. Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William P. Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William P. Tucker. William P. Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 41 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 61 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 60 | |
| 12 | 98 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About William P. Tucker
William P. Tucker is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pollution, having authored 30 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (4 papers), Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers) and Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (92 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (116 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (54 citations). William P. Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Carol R. Kepler, S.B. Tove, H. Robert Horton, G. Farrell, P.J. McNulty, Richard G. Hiskey, Arthur Roe, P. A. Stampe, R. J. Kennedy and Ramesh C. Pandey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.