William Newman

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

William Newman is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, William Newman has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in William Newman's work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (13 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). William Newman is often cited by papers focused on Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (13 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). William Newman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. William Newman's co-authors include Gregg W. Stone, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Donald E. Cutlip, Ali A. Rizvi, Dean J. Kereiakes, Charles A. Simonton, Ronald Caputo, Sherry Cao, Alexandra J. Lansky and John Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

William Newman

23 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Co... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 200 400 600

Peers

William Newman
GertJan Laarman Netherlands
Patrick Hall United States
Michael Collins United States
Douglas Spriggs United States
Roberto Diletti Netherlands
Conrad Simpfendorfer United States
GertJan Laarman Netherlands
William Newman
Citations per year, relative to William Newman William Newman (= 1×) peers GertJan Laarman

Countries citing papers authored by William Newman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Newman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Newman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Newman. The network helps show where William Newman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Newman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Newman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Newman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Newman. William Newman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yeh, Robert W., Olivier F. Bertrand, Ehtisham Mahmud, et al.. (2024). Randomized Comparison of Novel Low-Dose Sirolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Stent vs Second-Generation DES. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 85(6). 563–574. 1 indexed citations
2.
Singh, Balwinder, et al.. (2016). Abstract 17901: Women, Depression & Chronic Kidney Disease Are Associated With Higher Readmissions Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Circulation. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dangas, George, Patrick W. Serruys, Dean J. Kereiakes, et al.. (2013). Meta-Analysis of Everolimus-Eluting Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 6(9). 914–922. 121 indexed citations
5.
Gada, Hemal, Ajay J. Kirtane, William Newman, et al.. (2013). 5-Year Results of a Randomized Comparison of XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting and TAXUS Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 6(12). 1263–1266. 154 indexed citations
6.
Perisetti, Abhilash, et al.. (2013). Role of Prophylactic Pre-Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Endotracheal Intubation (ETI) in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed (UGIB): A Retrospective Study. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 108. S15–S16. 3 indexed citations
7.
Newman, William, et al.. (2012). Prevalence of iron overload in pediatric oncology patients after blood transfusion.. PubMed. 10(6). 363–5. 7 indexed citations
8.
Stone, Gregg W., Ali A. Rizvi, Krishnankutty Sudhir, et al.. (2011). Randomized Comparison of Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 58(1). 19–25. 172 indexed citations
9.
Hermiller, James, Manejeh Yaqub, William Newman, et al.. (2011). Performance of Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Small Vessels: Results from the SPIRIT III and SPIRIT IV Clinical Trials. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 24(6). 505–513. 22 indexed citations
10.
Stone, Gregg W., Ali A. Rizvi, William Newman, et al.. (2010). Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 362(18). 1663–1674. 622 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Lansky, Alexandra J., Vivian G. Ng, Ecaterina Cristea, et al.. (2009). Gender‐based evaluation of the XIENCE V™ everolimus‐eluting coronary stent system:. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 74(5). 719–727. 34 indexed citations
12.
McCann, Emma, Alan Fryer, William Newman, Richard Appleton, & Jürgen Kohlhase. (2005). A family with Duane anomaly and distal limb abnormalities: A further family with the arthrogryposis‐ophthalmoplegia syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. 139A(2). 123–126. 5 indexed citations
13.
Mann, Tift, Roberto J. Cubeddu, Josie Bowen, et al.. (2003). Coronary stenting in stable patients: Identification of a low‐risk subgroup that may not require adjunctive antiplatelet therapy. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 58(4). 459–466. 3 indexed citations
14.
Taylor, Henry M., et al.. (2003). Prolonged survival in hydranencephaly: a case report.. PubMed. 96(9). 423–4. 4 indexed citations
15.
Mann, Tift, Patricia A. Cowper, Eric D. Peterson, et al.. (2000). Transradial coronary stenting: Comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 49(2). 150–156. 111 indexed citations
16.
Mann, Tift, Patricia A. Cowper, Eric D. Peterson, et al.. (2000). Transradial coronary stenting: Comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 49(2). 150–150. 11 indexed citations
17.
Mann, Tift, Gabriela Cubeddu, Josie Bowen, et al.. (1998). Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 32(3). 572–576. 241 indexed citations
18.
Newman, William, et al.. (1956). ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDIES DURING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION. Anesthesiology. 17(5). 730–734. 4 indexed citations
20.
Burstein, Charles L., et al.. (1951). ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDIES DURING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION. III. EFFECTS DURING GENERAL ANESTHESIA AND INTRAVENOUS DIETHYLAMINOETHANOL. Anesthesiology. 12(4). 411–419. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026