British Journal of Ophthalmology

15.6k papers and 477.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 15.6k papers published in British Journal of Ophthalmology in the last decades have received a total of 477.0k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Ophthalmology usually cover Ophthalmology (9.9k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (5.6k papers) and Epidemiology (2.2k papers) specifically the topics of Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4.1k papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3.2k papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Ophthalmology are Michael Sanders, Harry A. Quigley, Sohan Singh Hayreh, Paul J. Foster, H A Quigley, Jost B. Jonas, Harminder S. Dua, Alan C. Bird, Nicholas J. Ashton and Donatella Pascolini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Ophthalmology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Ophthalmology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Ophthalmology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Ophthalmology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Ophthalmology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025