William McMahan

1.8k total citations
21 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

William McMahan is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, William McMahan has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 9 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 7 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in William McMahan's work include Soft Robotics and Applications (12 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (9 papers) and Robot Manipulation and Learning (7 papers). William McMahan is often cited by papers focused on Soft Robotics and Applications (12 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (9 papers) and Robot Manipulation and Learning (7 papers). William McMahan collaborates with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Italy. William McMahan's co-authors include Ian D. Walker, Bryan A. Jones, Katherine J. Kuchenbecker, Vilas K. Chitrakaran, Michael D. Grissom, M. Csencsits, Christopher D. Rahn, D. Dawson, David I. Lee and Alexei Wedmid and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Surgical Endoscopy and Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

In The Last Decade

William McMahan

21 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William McMahan United States 16 987 571 540 179 137 21 1.2k
Mohsen Mahvash United States 17 824 0.8× 381 0.7× 550 1.0× 178 1.0× 59 0.4× 25 1.2k
David L. Christensen United States 20 772 0.8× 280 0.5× 452 0.8× 206 1.2× 88 0.6× 44 1.4k
Peter Berkelman United States 19 594 0.6× 326 0.6× 329 0.6× 206 1.2× 64 0.5× 55 1.1k
Nadia Cheng United States 11 676 0.7× 288 0.5× 384 0.7× 153 0.9× 123 0.9× 12 928
Tania K. Morimoto United States 15 560 0.6× 177 0.3× 337 0.6× 73 0.4× 176 1.3× 51 741
Barrett Heyneman United States 9 766 0.8× 351 0.6× 386 0.7× 128 0.7× 48 0.4× 12 1.1k
Andrew H. Gosline United States 12 490 0.5× 221 0.4× 236 0.4× 81 0.5× 106 0.8× 21 658
Sina Sareh United Kingdom 15 626 0.6× 189 0.3× 247 0.5× 133 0.7× 110 0.8× 34 829
Mark A. Minor United States 20 847 0.9× 674 1.2× 412 0.8× 105 0.6× 73 0.5× 97 1.5k
Agostino Stilli United Kingdom 15 769 0.8× 318 0.6× 225 0.4× 80 0.4× 150 1.1× 42 898

Countries citing papers authored by William McMahan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William McMahan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William McMahan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William McMahan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William McMahan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William McMahan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William McMahan. The network helps show where William McMahan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William McMahan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William McMahan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William McMahan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William McMahan. William McMahan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gomez, Ernest, Rajesh Aggarwal, William McMahan, Karlin Bark, & Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. (2015). Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(4). 1419–1431. 23 indexed citations
2.
McMahan, William & Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. (2014). Dynamic modeling and control of voice-coil actuators for high-fidelity display of haptic vibrations. 115–122. 28 indexed citations
3.
Booth, Warren, et al.. (2014). New insights on facultative parthenogenesis in pythons. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 112(3). 461–468. 34 indexed citations
4.
Gomez, Ernest, William McMahan, Daniel A. Hashimoto, et al.. (2013). Haptic feedback of instrument vibrations improves performance during robotic surgical simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 217(3). S65–S66. 1 indexed citations
5.
McMahan, William, Ernest Gomez, Liting Chen, et al.. (2013). A practical system for recording instrument interactions during live robotic surgery. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 7(4). 351–358. 6 indexed citations
6.
Bark, Karlin, William McMahan, Austin C. Remington, et al.. (2012). In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 27(2). 656–664. 43 indexed citations
7.
Gomez, Ernest, Karlin Bark, William McMahan, et al.. (2012). Construct validity of instrument vibrations as a measure of robotic surgical skill. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 215(3). S119–S120. 3 indexed citations
8.
McMahan, William, et al.. (2011). ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS INSPIRED BY CEPHALOPOD LIMBS. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). 47 indexed citations
9.
McMahan, William, et al.. (2011). Tool Contact Acceleration Feedback for Telerobotic Surgery. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. 4(3). 210–220. 96 indexed citations
10.
McMahan, William, Joseph M. Romano, Abdul Abdul Rahuman, & Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. (2010). High frequency acceleration feedback significantly increases the realism of haptically rendered textured surfaces. 141–148. 49 indexed citations
11.
McMahan, William & Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. (2009). Haptic display of realistic tool contact via dynamically compensated control of a dedicated actuator. 3170–3177. 28 indexed citations
12.
McMahan, William & Ian D. Walker. (2009). Octopus-inspired grasp-synergies for continuum manipulators. 945–950. 56 indexed citations
13.
McMahan, William & Katherine J. Kuchenbecker. (2009). Displaying realistic contact accelerations via a dedicated vibration actuator. 613–614. 5 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Bryan A., William McMahan, Vilas K. Chitrakaran, et al.. (2007). OctArm - A soft robotic manipulator. 2569–2569. 51 indexed citations
15.
McMahan, William, Vilas K. Chitrakaran, M. Csencsits, et al.. (2006). Field trials and testing of the OctArm continuum manipulator. 2336–2341. 349 indexed citations
16.
Grissom, Michael D., Vilas K. Chitrakaran, Bryan A. Jones, et al.. (2006). Design and experimental testing of the OctArm soft robot manipulator. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6230. 62301F–62301F. 105 indexed citations
17.
Jones, Bryan A., William McMahan, & Ian D. Walker. (2006). Practical kinematics for real-time implementation of continuum robots. 2. 1840–1847. 33 indexed citations
18.
Csencsits, M., William McMahan, Vilas K. Chitrakaran, et al.. (2006). Field Experiments with the OctArm Continuum Manipulator. 10–10. 4 indexed citations
19.
McMahan, William, Bryan A. Jones, & Ian D. Walker. (2005). Design and implementation of a multi-section continuum robot: Air-Octor. 2578–2585. 186 indexed citations
20.
Jones, Bryan A., William McMahan, & Ian D. Walker. (2004). Design and Analysis of a Novel Pneumatic Manipulator. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 37(14). 687–692. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026