William M. Johnson
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John J. MieyalAmy L. Wilson‐DelfosseD. W. S. WestlakeD. R. RaoW. Daniel StamerMichael A. HauserArthur F. DiSalvoD. M. Lavigne
- Topics
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers)Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers)Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (5 papers)
- Cited by
- AgingOphthalmologyBiochemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
William M. Johnson
62 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Molecular Biology 432
- Ecology 205
- Plant Science 175
- Ophthalmology 150
- Neurology 124
Countries citing papers authored by William M. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of William M. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William M. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William M. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William M. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William M. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William M. Johnson. The network helps show where William M. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William M. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William M. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William M. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William M. Johnson. William M. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | Range Seeding in the Ponderosa Pine Zone in Colorado | 0 |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 65 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 71 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | Soil Taxonomy: A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys | 3 |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | SOIL TAXONOMY: AN OVERVIEW | 0 |
| 13 | Susceptibility of some crops and weeds to Verticillium dahliae Kleb. isolated from cotton. | 1 |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About William M. Johnson
William M. Johnson is a scholar working on Aging, Chemical Health and Safety and Anthropology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers) and Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (33 citations), Ophthalmology (150 citations) and Biochemistry (114 citations). William M. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include John J. Mieyal, Amy L. Wilson‐Delfosse, D. W. S. Westlake, D. R. Rao, W. Daniel Stamer, Michael A. Hauser, Arthur F. DiSalvo, D. M. Lavigne, Inas F. Aboobakar and R. Rand Allingham. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.