William Lu

24 papers receiving 672 citations

Peers

William Lu
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Developmental Neuroscience 63
  • Rehabilitation 51
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 127
  • Surgery 282
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 97
Replace Hendrik van de Meent with:
Hendrik van de Meent Netherlands
K T Ragnarsson United States
Haruhisa Fukayama Japan
Bruce Day Australia
Kyung Jae Yoon South Korea
Virginia Graziani United States
Richard W. Stremel United States
Meegan G. Van Straaten United States
Erin A. Baker United States
Christian Schuld Germany
William Lu relative to Hendrik van de Meent Netherlands Hendrik van de Meent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Hendrik van de Meent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Lu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Lu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Lu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Lu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Lu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Lu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Lu. The network helps show where William Lu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Lu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Lu Line = papers co-authored together William Lu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996119
2 201781
3 201771
4 199757
5 201244
6 201834
7 201734
8 199326
9 202024
10 201623
11 201122
12 201222
13 201919
14 201518
15 201818
16 199616
17 201915
18 201411
19 202111
20 20239

About William Lu

William Lu is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 26 papers that have together received 694 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (12 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (9 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (8 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (3 papers), Nosocomial Infections in ICU (2 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (63 citations), Rehabilitation (51 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (127 citations), Surgery (282 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (97 citations). William Lu has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Munjed Al Muderis, Jiao Jiao Li, Stanley J. Wiegand, David M. Yurek, Susan B. Hipkens, Kevin Tetsworth, Hsiung–Fei Chien, Denise H. Rhoney, Robert Göder and Jason W. Krellman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, BMJ Open, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurorehabilitation and Experimental Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact