William L. Hohman

710 total citations
42 papers, 563 citations indexed

About

William L. Hohman is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Water Science and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, William L. Hohman has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 563 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Ecology, 15 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 7 papers in Water Science and Technology. Recurrent topics in William L. Hohman's work include Avian ecology and behavior (19 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers). William L. Hohman is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (19 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (10 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers). William L. Hohman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. William L. Hohman's co-authors include Thomas W. Custer, Thomas J. Benson, James J. Dinsmore, J. Christian Franson, James H. Devries, C. Davison Ankney, B. Martin, Richard M. Pace, Richard D. Crawford and Brian L. Cypher and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Pollution and Journal of Wildlife Management.

In The Last Decade

William L. Hohman

41 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William L. Hohman United States 15 413 182 110 86 80 42 563
Stephen P. Havera United States 16 439 1.1× 215 1.2× 55 0.5× 121 1.4× 55 0.7× 39 584
James K. Ringelman United States 19 818 2.0× 292 1.6× 98 0.9× 85 1.0× 212 2.6× 37 1.0k
Robert L. Jarvis United States 14 793 1.9× 240 1.3× 134 1.2× 28 0.3× 121 1.5× 32 897
Erwin E. Klaas United States 16 457 1.1× 121 0.7× 77 0.7× 123 1.4× 100 1.3× 31 609
Nicola Baccetti Italy 11 377 0.9× 99 0.5× 55 0.5× 72 0.8× 62 0.8× 43 526
Katharine C. Parsons United States 14 350 0.8× 136 0.7× 78 0.7× 204 2.4× 74 0.9× 30 582
Teryl G. Grubb United States 14 505 1.2× 118 0.6× 135 1.2× 99 1.2× 98 1.2× 50 684
Andrzej Wuczyński Poland 12 391 0.9× 250 1.4× 168 1.5× 51 0.6× 117 1.5× 43 602
Shannon S. Badzinski Canada 14 367 0.9× 153 0.8× 37 0.3× 94 1.1× 72 0.9× 33 470
Patrick W. Brown United States 12 328 0.8× 168 0.9× 84 0.8× 67 0.8× 112 1.4× 28 539

Countries citing papers authored by William L. Hohman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Hohman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Hohman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Hohman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Hohman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Hohman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Hohman. The network helps show where William L. Hohman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Hohman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Hohman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Hohman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Hohman. William L. Hohman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fox, Anthony David, Paul L. Flint, William L. Hohman, & Jean‐Pierre L. Savard. (2014). Waterfowl habitat use and selection during the remigial moult period in the northern hemisphere. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 131–168. 22 indexed citations
2.
Hohman, William L., et al.. (2014). Opportunities and challenges to waterfowl habitat conservation on private land. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 368–406. 5 indexed citations
3.
Roy, C., et al.. (2012). Ring-necked Duck (Aythya collaris). The Birds of North America Online.
4.
Benson, Thomas J., James J. Dinsmore, & William L. Hohman. (2011). Short-term Effects of Burning and Disking on Songbird Use of Floodplain Conservation Easements. The American Midland Naturalist. 165(2). 257–273. 5 indexed citations
5.
Benson, Thomas J., James J. Dinsmore, & William L. Hohman. (2007). Responses of Plants and Arthropods to Burning and Disking of Riparian Habitats. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71(6). 1949–1957. 21 indexed citations
6.
Benson, Thomas J., James J. Dinsmore, & William L. Hohman. (2006). Changes in Land Cover and Breeding Bird Populations with Restoration of Riparian Habitats in East-central Iowa. UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa). 113. 10–16. 8 indexed citations
7.
Debinski, Diane M., et al.. (2006). Butterflies and Continuous Conservation Reserve Program Filter Strips: Landscape Considerations. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 34(4). 936–943. 23 indexed citations
8.
Hohman, William L., et al.. (2001). Fulvous Whistling-Duck (Dendrocygna bicolor). The Birds of North America Online. 8 indexed citations
9.
Hobson, Keith A., Robert B. Brua, William L. Hohman, & Leonard I. Wassenaar. (2000). LOW FREQUENCY OF “DOUBLE MOLT” OF REMIGES IN RUDDY DUCKS REVEALED BY STABLE ISOTOPES: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRACKING MIGRATORY WATERFOWL. The Auk. 117(1). 129–129. 19 indexed citations
10.
Hobson, Keith A., Robert B. Brua, William L. Hohman, & Leonard I. Wassenaar. (2000). Low Frequency of “Double Molt” of Remiges in Ruddy Ducks Revealed by Stable Isotopes: Implications for Tracking Migratory Waterfowl. The Auk. 117(1). 129–135. 3 indexed citations
11.
Pace, Richard M., William L. Hohman, & Thomas W. Custer. (1999). Lead effects on body composition and organ size of wintering canvasbacks Aythya valisineria in Louisiana. Wildlife Biology. 5(1). 3–10. 2 indexed citations
12.
Hohman, William L.. (1996). Prevalence of double wing molt in free-living ruddy ducks. The Southwestern Naturalist. 41(2). 195–198. 4 indexed citations
13.
Franson, J. Christian, et al.. (1996). The efficacy of protoporphyrin as a predictive biomarker for lead exposure in canvasback ducks: Effect of sample storage time. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 43(2). 181–188. 7 indexed citations
14.
Hohman, William L. & Richard D. Crawford. (1995). Molt in the Annual Cycle of Ring-Necked Ducks. Ornithological Applications. 97(2). 473–483. 13 indexed citations
15.
Custer, Thomas W. & William L. Hohman. (1994). Trace elements in canvasbacks (Aythya valisineria) wintering in Louisiana, USA, 1987–1988. Environmental Pollution. 84(3). 253–259. 26 indexed citations
16.
Hohman, William L.. (1993). Body composition dynamics of ruddy ducks during wing moult. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 71(11). 2224–2228. 23 indexed citations
17.
Hohman, William L.. (1991). Incubation rhythm components for three Cinnamon Teal nesting in California. 23(4). 229–234. 3 indexed citations
18.
Hohman, William L., et al.. (1986). Indices of Fat and Protein for Ring-Necked Ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(2). 209–209. 11 indexed citations
19.
Hohman, William L. & Brian L. Cypher. (1986). Age-Class Determination of Ring-Necked Ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management. 50(3). 442–442. 14 indexed citations
20.
Crawford, Richard D. & William L. Hohman. (1978). A Method for Aging Female Yellow-Headed Blackbirds. Bird-Banding. 49(3). 201–201. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026