William L. Clinton
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 2%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Co-authors
- L. J. MassaM. A. EsrickW. SacksGeorge A. HendersonHerbert RufLou MassaM. H. CohenAlexandra F. Freeman
- Topics
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers)Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (11 papers)Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Physical and Theoretical ChemistryAtomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsSurfaces, Coatings and Films
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
William L. Clinton
46 papers receiving 691 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 484
- Materials Chemistry 237
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 197
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 128
- Spectroscopy 101
Countries citing papers authored by William L. Clinton
This map shows the geographic impact of William L. Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William L. Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William L. Clinton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William L. Clinton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William L. Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William L. Clinton. The network helps show where William L. Clinton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William L. Clinton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William L. Clinton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William L. Clinton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William L. Clinton. William L. Clinton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 45 |
About William L. Clinton
William L. Clinton is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (11 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (197 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (484 citations) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (76 citations). William L. Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include L. J. Massa, M. A. Esrick, W. Sacks, George A. Henderson, Herbert Ruf, Lou Massa, M. H. Cohen, Alexandra F. Freeman, P. E. Seiden and David L. Price. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Reviews of Modern Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.