Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Stereo Plume Height and Motion Retrievals for the Record‐Setting Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Eruption of 15 January 2022
2022125 citationsJames L. Carr, Ákos Horváth et al.Geophysical Research Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Carr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Carr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Carr more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Carr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Carr. The network helps show where James L. Carr may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Carr
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Carr.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Carr based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Carr. James L. Carr is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carr, James L., Heesung Chong, Xiong Liu, et al.. (2025). TEMPO at Night. Earth and Space Science. 12(10).1 indexed citations
4.
Carr, James L., Ákos Horváth, Dong L. Wu, & Mariel D. Friberg. (2022). Stereo Plume Height and Motion Retrievals for the Record‐Setting Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Eruption of 15 January 2022. Geophysical Research Letters. 49(9).125 indexed citations breakdown →
Carr, James L. & Dong L. Wu. (2018). Future 3D-Wind Measurements from Multi-Satellite Observations: A Demonstration with MISR and GOES-R. AGUFM. 2018.1 indexed citations
Carr, James L., Xiong Liu, Brian Baker, & K. Chance. (2017). Observing Nightlights from Space with TEMPO. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 19(1). 26–35.4 indexed citations
13.
Carr, James L., et al.. (2015). Inter-Comparisons between Radiometric and Geometric Cloud Top Height Products. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2015.1 indexed citations
14.
Carr, James L., et al.. (2014). LINKED DATA REGISTRY: A NEW APPROACH TO TECHNICAL REGISTRIES. iPRES.
15.
Carr, James L.. (2012). Verifying the Accuracy of Geostationary Weather Satellite Image Navigation and Registration. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2012.2 indexed citations
Carr, James L.. (1992). Image navigation for geostationary weather satellites. ESASP. 341. 513–531.1 indexed citations
18.
Carr, James L., et al.. (1990). Simulation studies of the GOES-I Image Navigation and Registration (INR) system. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 25–51.1 indexed citations
Atwood, W. B., James L. Carr, G. B. Chadwick, et al.. (1986). Performance of the SLD central drift chamber prototype. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 252(2-3). 295–298.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.