William K. Krebs
- Media Technology top 2%
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edward A. EssockJason S. McCarleyMichael J. SinaiDean A. ScribnerRobert D. FechtnerThom J. ZimmermanSanjoy DasAlbert J. Ahumada
- Topics
- Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (10 papers)Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (7 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & PerformanceElectronics LettersHuman Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William K. Krebs
19 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Media Technology 138
- Aerospace Engineering 132
- Cognitive Neuroscience 121
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 108
- Ophthalmology 36
Countries citing papers authored by William K. Krebs
This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Krebs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Krebs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Krebs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Krebs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Krebs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Krebs. The network helps show where William K. Krebs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William K. Krebs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William K. Krebs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William K. Krebs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William K. Krebs. William K. Krebs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About William K. Krebs
William K. Krebs is a scholar working on Media Technology, Aerospace Engineering and Ophthalmology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (10 papers), Advanced Image Fusion Techniques (7 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (138 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (121 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (132 citations). William K. Krebs has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward A. Essock, Jason S. McCarley, Michael J. Sinai, Dean A. Scribner, Robert D. Fechtner, Thom J. Zimmerman, Sanjoy Das, Albert J. Ahumada, Michael A. Crognale and Robert V. McDaniel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Electronics Letters and Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.