Kees Teunissen

580 total citations
48 papers, 429 citations indexed

About

Kees Teunissen is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Kees Teunissen has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 429 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 18 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 17 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Kees Teunissen's work include Color Science and Applications (21 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (12 papers). Kees Teunissen is often cited by papers focused on Color Science and Applications (21 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (17 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (12 papers). Kees Teunissen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, China and Belgium. Kees Teunissen's co-authors include Ingrid Heynderickx, Yan Tu, Joyce H. D. M. Westerink, Li Chen, Yuning Zhang, Kevin Smet, Lili Wang, Peter Hanselaer, Katherine Curran and Xiaowei Yang and has published in prestigious journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express and IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

In The Last Decade

Kees Teunissen

46 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kees Teunissen Netherlands 13 182 169 163 147 69 48 429
Eva M. Valero Spain 13 210 1.2× 317 1.9× 107 0.7× 156 1.1× 49 0.7× 78 582
A. Vorozcovs Canada 7 356 2.0× 266 1.6× 69 0.4× 130 0.9× 17 0.2× 16 543
Youngshin Kwak South Korea 10 97 0.5× 205 1.2× 150 0.9× 36 0.2× 163 2.4× 74 377
Matthew Trentacoste Canada 9 656 3.6× 312 1.8× 86 0.5× 224 1.5× 22 0.3× 13 799
Laurent Blondé France 8 94 0.5× 125 0.7× 126 0.8× 69 0.5× 80 1.2× 38 304
Frans J. J. Blommaert Netherlands 12 210 1.2× 238 1.4× 250 1.5× 87 0.6× 188 2.7× 27 537
Du‐Sik Park South Korea 15 543 3.0× 130 0.8× 103 0.6× 193 1.3× 98 1.4× 69 819
Eisuke Nakasu Japan 9 231 1.3× 70 0.4× 47 0.3× 92 0.6× 23 0.3× 22 355
David L. Post United States 9 78 0.4× 212 1.3× 113 0.7× 25 0.2× 185 2.7× 34 327
Michael Stokes United States 4 272 1.5× 195 1.2× 50 0.3× 68 0.5× 61 0.9× 9 441

Countries citing papers authored by Kees Teunissen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kees Teunissen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kees Teunissen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kees Teunissen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kees Teunissen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kees Teunissen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kees Teunissen. The network helps show where Kees Teunissen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kees Teunissen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kees Teunissen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kees Teunissen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kees Teunissen. Kees Teunissen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Teunissen, Kees. (2019). Opinion: Light quality: Adequacy to fulfil an application-specific function. Lighting Research & Technology. 51(5). 656–656. 2 indexed citations
2.
Smet, Kevin, et al.. (2018). Application specific extension of the MCRI: Memory colors and preferred colors of reddish meat products. Color Research & Application. 43(6). 899–906. 1 indexed citations
3.
Curran, Katherine, et al.. (2017). How is museum lighting selected? An insight into current practice in UK museums. Journal of the Institute of Conservation. 40(1). 3–14. 33 indexed citations
4.
Wang, Lili, et al.. (2017). P‐141: Phantom Array Effect of LED Lighting. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 48(1). 1804–1807. 4 indexed citations
5.
Li, Xiaohua, et al.. (2013). A study on the perceptual relevance of crosstalk equations for stereoscopic displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 21(6). 271–279. 7 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Lili, Yan Tu, Li Chen, et al.. (2012). Effect of Display Technology on the Crosstalk Perception in Stereoscopic Video Content. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology. 22(9). 1257–1265. 3 indexed citations
7.
Wang, Lili, Kees Teunissen, Yan Tu, et al.. (2011). Crosstalk Evaluation in Stereoscopic Displays. Journal of Display Technology. 7(4). 208–214. 38 indexed citations
8.
Teunissen, Kees, et al.. (2010). 9.4: Invited Paper : EcoDesign for TV Displays. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 41(1). 116–119. 1 indexed citations
9.
Teunissen, Kees, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of motion performance on scanning‐backlight LCDs. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 17(3). 251–261. 3 indexed citations
10.
Zhang, Yuning, et al.. (2008). Dynamic modulation transfer function: a method to characterize the temporal performance of liquid-crystal displays. Optics Letters. 33(6). 533–533. 13 indexed citations
11.
Teunissen, Kees, Xuefei Zhong, Ting Chen, & Ingrid Heynderickx. (2008). A new characterization method to define the viewing angle range of matrix displays. Displays. 30(2). 77–83. 8 indexed citations
12.
Heynderickx, Ingrid & Kees Teunissen. (2008). Introduction: Special Section on Display Characterization. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 16(10). 977–979. 3 indexed citations
13.
Teunissen, Kees, et al.. (2008). 10.2: Motion Artifact Analysis on Scanning Backlight LCD. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 39(1). 113–116. 3 indexed citations
14.
Teunissen, Kees, et al.. (2007). 27.4: Statistical Approach to Find a Perceptually Relevant Measure for the Viewing Angle Dependency of Displays. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 38(1). 1150–1153. 3 indexed citations
15.
Wang, Lili, Yan Tu, Li Chen, Kees Teunissen, & Ingrid Heynderickx. (2007). 27.2: Trade‐off between Luminance and Color in RGBW Displays for Mobile‐phone Usage. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 38(1). 1142–1145. 23 indexed citations
16.
Li, Xiao‐Hua, et al.. (2007). 26.3: Characterizing LCD Motion Color Artifacts Using Simulation Methods. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 38(1). 1130–1133. 1 indexed citations
17.
Xia, Jun, et al.. (2007). P‐37: Just Noticeable Difference of Image Attributes for Natural Images. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 38(1). 326–329. 5 indexed citations
18.
Teunissen, Kees, et al.. (2007). Modeling motion‐induced color artifacts from the temporal step response. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 15(12). 1065–1071. 3 indexed citations
19.
Teunissen, Kees, et al.. (2007). A perceptually based metric to characterize the viewing‐angle range of matrix displays. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 16(1). 27–36. 6 indexed citations
20.
Yang, Xiaowei, et al.. (2006). 3.2: LCD Motion Artifact Determination Using Simulation Methods. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 37(1). 6–9. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026