William K. Chapman

521 total citations
16 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

William K. Chapman is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, William K. Chapman has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Ecology and 5 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in William K. Chapman's work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers) and Forest ecology and management (3 papers). William K. Chapman is often cited by papers focused on Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (8 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers) and Forest ecology and management (3 papers). William K. Chapman collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. William K. Chapman's co-authors include Cindy E. Prescott, J. M. Kranabetter, Paul Sanborn, Robert F. Powers, Allan E. Tiarks, Anya Reid, Deborah S. Page‐Dumroese, Shannon M. Berch, Felipe G. Sanchez and Leslie R. Paul and has published in prestigious journals such as The ISME Journal, Forest Ecology and Management and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.

In The Last Decade

William K. Chapman

16 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers

William K. Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Global and Planetary Change 182
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 140
  • Plant Science 127
  • Insect Science 106
  • Soil Science 104
Replace Kim H. Ludovici with:
Kim H. Ludovici United States
Hardo Becker Estonia
Gary O. Fiddler United States
Lars‐Owe Nilsson Sweden
Jens Wöllecke Germany
Aivo Vares Estonia
Nathan Peterson Canada
Jonalea R. Tonn United States
Jian R. Wang Canada
Tony Letchford Canada
Kim H. Ludovici United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to William K. Chapman
William K. Chapman · 1×
Citations per year, relative to William K. Chapman
William K. Chapman · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by William K. Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William K. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William K. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William K. Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William K. Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William K. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William K. Chapman. The network helps show where William K. Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William K. Chapman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William K. Chapman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William K. Chapman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William K. Chapman. William K. Chapman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 46
2 4
3 42
4 7
5 35
6 13
7 17
8 10
9 52
10 1
11 105
12 55
13 18
14 5
15 2
16 7

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026