David C. Baldus

916 total citations
22 papers, 552 citations indexed

About

David C. Baldus is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, David C. Baldus has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 552 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Law. Recurrent topics in David C. Baldus's work include Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (8 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers). David C. Baldus is often cited by papers focused on Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (8 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 papers). David C. Baldus collaborates with scholars based in United States. David C. Baldus's co-authors include George Woodworth, David Zuckerman, Neil Alan Weiner, Gary Kleck, Jeffrey Fagan, Wayne A. Bowers, David H. Kaye, Jeffrey E. Max, Erika Gaylor and Jeffrey Fagan and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-) and The Yale Law Journal.

In The Last Decade

David C. Baldus

20 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David C. Baldus United States 10 387 168 124 77 75 22 552
Marian R. Williams United States 12 447 1.2× 99 0.6× 72 0.6× 139 1.8× 96 1.3× 22 511
Shamena Anwar United States 7 303 0.8× 104 0.6× 147 1.2× 44 0.6× 46 0.6× 24 464
George F. Cole United States 11 284 0.7× 121 0.7× 80 0.6× 75 1.0× 23 0.3× 23 427
Jon B. Gould United States 11 227 0.6× 118 0.7× 50 0.4× 39 0.5× 41 0.5× 40 365
Ronald A. Farrell United States 15 659 1.7× 85 0.5× 85 0.7× 231 3.0× 84 1.1× 23 768
William J. Stuntz United States 12 393 1.0× 199 1.2× 172 1.4× 65 0.8× 10 0.1× 38 641
Wayne R. LaFave United States 8 222 0.6× 84 0.5× 39 0.3× 39 0.5× 22 0.3× 33 348
Kathryn Abrams United States 10 196 0.5× 107 0.6× 17 0.1× 40 0.5× 135 1.8× 47 399
Richard S. Frase United States 17 620 1.6× 162 1.0× 147 1.2× 262 3.4× 14 0.2× 67 767
Roger Hood United Kingdom 12 536 1.4× 75 0.4× 34 0.3× 253 3.3× 47 0.6× 31 677

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Baldus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Baldus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Baldus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Baldus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Baldus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Baldus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Baldus. The network helps show where David C. Baldus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David C. Baldus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David C. Baldus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David C. Baldus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David C. Baldus. David C. Baldus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fagan, Jeffrey, et al.. (2019). Death by Stereotype: Race, Ethnicity, and California’s Failure to Implement Furman ’s Narrowing Requirement. UCLA law review. 66. 1394. 1 indexed citations
2.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (2019). Furman at 45: Constitutional Challenges from California's Failure to (Again) Narrow Death Eligibility. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 16(4). 693–730. 3 indexed citations
3.
Baldus, David C. & George Woodworth. (2014). Race Discrimination and the Legitamacy of Capital Punishment: Reflections on the Interaction of Fact and Perception. ˜The œDe Paul law review. 53(4). 1411. 4 indexed citations
4.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (2012). Racial Discrimination in the Administration of the Death Penalty: the Experience of the United States Armed Forces (1984-2005). The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 101(4). 1227–1336. 4 indexed citations
6.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (2009). Role of Intimacy in the Prosecution and Sentencing of Capital Murder Cases in the United States Armed Forces, 1984-2005. 1 indexed citations
7.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (2007). Race and Proportionality Since McCleskey v. Kemp (1987): Different Actors with Mixed Strategies of Denial and Avoidance. Humanities Commons CORE (Modern Language Association / Columbia University). 39(39). 143. 3 indexed citations
8.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (2007). Arbitrariness and Discrimination in the Administration of the Death Penalty: A Legal and Empirical Analysis of the Nebraska Experience (1973-1999). Insecta mundi. 17 indexed citations
9.
Baldus, David C., George Woodworth, David Zuckerman, & Neil Alan Weiner. (2001). The Use of Peremptory Challenges in Capital Murder Trials: A Legal and Empirical Analysis. eYLS (Yale Law School). 3(1). 3. 41 indexed citations
10.
Baldus, David C., George Woodworth, David Zuckerman, & Neil Alan Weiner. (1998). Racial Discrimination and the Death Penalty in the Post-Furman Era: An Empirical and Legal Overview with Recent Findings from Philadelphia. Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly. 83(6). 1638. 112 indexed citations
11.
Max, Jeffrey E., Wayne A. Bowers, David C. Baldus, & Erika Gaylor. (1998). Pediatric traumatic brain injury and burn patients in the civil justice system: the prevalence and impact of psychiatric symptomatology.. PubMed. 26(2). 247–58. 3 indexed citations
12.
Baldus, David C.. (1995). The Death Penalty Dialogue Between Law and Social Science (Symposium Keynote Address). Indiana law journal. 70(4). 1. 1 indexed citations
13.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (1994). Reflections on the "Inevitability" of RacialDiscrimination in Capital Sentencing andthe "Impossibility" of Its Prevention,Detection, and Correction. Washington and Lee law review. 51(2). 359. 12 indexed citations
14.
Baldus, David C. & George Woodworth. (1993). Proportionality: The View of the Special Master. CHANCE. 6(3). 9–17. 1 indexed citations
15.
Kleck, Gary, et al.. (1991). Equal Justice and the Death Penalty: A Legal and Empirical Analysis.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 20(4). 598–598. 64 indexed citations
16.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (1983). Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 74(3). 661–661. 165 indexed citations
17.
Kaye, David H., et al.. (1982). The Numbers Game: Statistical Inference in Discrimination Cases. Michigan Law Review. 80(4). 833–833. 3 indexed citations
18.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (1980). Identifying Comparatively Excessive Sentences of Death: A Quantitative Approach. Stanford Law Review. 33(1). 1–1. 9 indexed citations
19.
Baldus, David C., et al.. (1980). Statistical proof of discrimination. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 46 indexed citations
20.
Baldus, David C.. (1973). Welfare as a Loan: An Empirical Study of the Recovery of Public Assistance Payments in the United States. Stanford Law Review. 25(2). 123–123. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026