William J. Rogers
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Costas T. LambrewNathan R. EveryFrederick A. SpencerJohn G. CantoAlan J. TiefenbrunnDavid ShoultzLaura J. BowlbyWilliam J. French
- Topics
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers)Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineInternal MedicineRadiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Journals
- The Journal of Chemical PhysicsAnnals of Internal MedicineJournal of the American College of Cardiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoCanada
In The Last Decade
William J. Rogers
16 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 866
- Surgery 432
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 289
- Biomedical Engineering 139
- Emergency Medicine 121
Countries citing papers authored by William J. Rogers
This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Rogers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Rogers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Rogers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Rogers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Rogers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Rogers. The network helps show where William J. Rogers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William J. Rogers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William J. Rogers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William J. Rogers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William J. Rogers. William J. Rogers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 499 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 226 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 125 | |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 |
About William J. Rogers
William J. Rogers is a scholar working on Biophysics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Classics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (866 citations), Internal Medicine (58 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (289 citations). William J. Rogers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Costas T. Lambrew, Nathan R. Every, Frederick A. Spencer, John G. Canto, Alan J. Tiefenbrunn, David Shoultz, Laura J. Bowlby, William J. French, Joel M. Gore and Richard C. Becker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Annals of Internal Medicine and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.