Thomas Andrews
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Sharon C. ReimoldJesse A. BerlinElliott M. AntmanJudith HsiaChristie M. BallantyneGail MacCallumGeorge SopkoPeter H. Stone
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers)Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Thomas Andrews
39 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.4k
- Surgery 732
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 356
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 313
- Economics and Econometrics 201
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Andrews
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Andrews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Andrews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Andrews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Andrews
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Andrews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Andrews. The network helps show where Thomas Andrews may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Andrews
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Andrews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Andrews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Andrews. Thomas Andrews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 60 | |
| 3 | 150 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 152 | |
| 6 | 140 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 110 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Thomas Andrews
Thomas Andrews is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Decision Sciences and Internal Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.4k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (313 citations) and Surgery (732 citations). Thomas Andrews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Sharon C. Reimold, Jesse A. Berlin, Elliott M. Antman, Judith Hsia, Christie M. Ballantyne, Gail MacCallum, George Sopko, Peter H. Stone, Martial G. Bourassa and Bernard Chaitman. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.