William J. Gee

49 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

William J. Gee
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Inorganic Chemistry 319
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 265
  • Materials Chemistry 342
  • Safety Research 52
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 54
Replace N.G.R. Hearns with:
N.G.R. Hearns France
Lippy F. Marques Brazil
H.E. Abdou United States
С. Б. Мешкова Ukraine
Raoul Plessius Netherlands
Pradip Bag India
R. Kannappan India
Lydia Karmazin France
Ian D. Giles United States
A.I. Prikhod'ko Germany
William J. Gee relative to N.G.R. Hearns France N.G.R. Hearns's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
N.G.R. Hearns · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William J. Gee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William J. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William J. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William J. Gee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William J. Gee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William J. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William J. Gee. The network helps show where William J. Gee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William J. Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William J. Gee Line = papers co-authored together William J. Gee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201246
2 201246
3 201240
4 201238
5 201334
6 201827
7 201126
8 201726
9 201624
10 201721
11 201221
12 201419
13 201219
14 201618
15 201617
16 201816
17 201416
18 201814
19 201913
20 201712

About William J. Gee

William J. Gee is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Safety Research, having authored 51 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (17 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (16 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (11 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (10 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (5 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (5 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (4 papers) and Digital and Cyber Forensics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (319 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (265 citations), Materials Chemistry (342 citations), Safety Research (52 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (54 citations). William J. Gee has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stuart R. Batten, Philip C. Andrews, ‬Peter C. Junk, Paul R. Raithby, Andrew D. Burrows, Keith S. Murray, J.G. MacLellan, Chick C. Wilson, Massimiliano Massi and Boujemaa Moubaraki. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, CrystEngComm, Chemical Communications, Dalton Transactions and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact