Philip C. Andrews
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Oncology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter C. JunkVictoria L. BlairColin L. RastonŁukasz KedzierskiGlen B. DeaconIsh KumarCraig M. ForsythJ.G. MacLellan
- Topics
- Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (52 papers)Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (37 papers)Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (31 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip C. Andrews
209 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Organic Chemistry 2.4k
- Inorganic Chemistry 1.6k
- Materials Chemistry 1.3k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 628
- Oncology 611
Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Andrews
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Andrews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Andrews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Andrews more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Andrews
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Andrews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Andrews. The network helps show where Philip C. Andrews may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Andrews
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Andrews. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Andrews based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Andrews. Philip C. Andrews is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 120 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | Schistosomicidal agents. 3. N4-(N-acyl-N-arylglycyl)sulphanilamides substituted by alkyl or alkoxy groups in the aryl residue. | 1 |
About Philip C. Andrews
Philip C. Andrews is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 210 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (52 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (37 papers) and Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (1.6k citations), Organic Chemistry (2.4k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (628 citations). Philip C. Andrews has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter C. Junk, Victoria L. Blair, Colin L. Raston, Łukasz Kedzierski, Glen B. Deacon, Ish Kumar, Craig M. Forsyth, J.G. MacLellan, Melissa V. Werrett and Richard L. Ferrero. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.