Helen Carr

26 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Helen Carr
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 73
  • Public Administration 22
  • General Health Professions 73
  • History 27
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 43
Replace Chloe Parton with:
Chloe Parton Australia
Miriam Bernard United States
T. J. Samuel United States
Gertrude Fraser United States
Caren J. Frost United States
Paul Douglass United States
Elsie J. Wang United States
Claire Salter United Kingdom
Catherine Gordon United States
Erin K. Tagai United States
Helen Carr relative to Chloe Parton Australia Chloe Parton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Chloe Parton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Carr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Carr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Carr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Carr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Carr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Carr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Carr. The network helps show where Helen Carr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Carr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Carr Line = papers co-authored together Helen Carr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201367
2 201547
3 200241
4 200541
5 200814
6 201413
7 201612
8 201710
9 20149
10 20226
11 20126
12 19965
13 20124
14
Response to the DWP consultation paper: No one written off: reforming welfare to reward responsibility
20084
15 20144
16
Social Movements for Health: What the programme taught us
20203
17
Juggling the dual role of practitioner and educator: practice teachers' perceptions.
20122
18 20242
19 20092
20 20241

About Helen Carr

Helen Carr is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Finance, Political Science and International Relations and Clinical Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (2 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (73 citations), Public Administration (22 citations), General Health Professions (73 citations), History (27 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (43 citations). Helen Carr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Simon de Lusignan, Pierre Bouloux, Ploutarchos Tzoulis, Emmanouil Bagkeris, Caroline Hunter, Jeremy van Vlymen, Andrew McGovern, Neil Munro, Lucilla Butler and Simon Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, British Journal of General Practice, Housing Studies, PLoS ONE and BMC Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact