William H. Hay

1.0k total citations
16 papers, 330 citations indexed

About

William H. Hay is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Classics. According to data from OpenAlex, William H. Hay has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 330 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 4 papers in Philosophy and 1 paper in Classics. Recurrent topics in William H. Hay's work include Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (2 papers). William H. Hay is often cited by papers focused on Historical Philosophy and Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (2 papers). William H. Hay collaborates with scholars based in United States. William H. Hay's co-authors include Rudolf Carnap, Georg Henrik von Wright, Paul Oskar Kristeller, Y. H. Krikorian, Marcus G. Singer and Arthur Ε. Murphy and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

In The Last Decade

William H. Hay

13 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William H. Hay United States 4 136 125 54 52 42 16 330
Maria Reichenbach United States 6 190 1.4× 114 0.9× 57 1.1× 22 0.4× 72 1.7× 7 467
R. D. Rosenkrantz United States 10 167 1.2× 122 1.0× 88 1.6× 21 0.4× 35 0.8× 19 387
Austin J. Bonis United States 6 107 0.8× 119 1.0× 75 1.4× 19 0.4× 25 0.6× 9 389
Robert E. Butts Canada 11 206 1.5× 48 0.4× 141 2.6× 33 0.6× 60 1.4× 42 464
C. Howson United Kingdom 3 119 0.9× 89 0.7× 86 1.6× 18 0.3× 40 1.0× 4 280
Peter Krauss United States 8 97 0.7× 269 2.2× 188 3.5× 183 3.5× 95 2.3× 16 539
Theo A. F. Kuipers Netherlands 11 259 1.9× 161 1.3× 115 2.1× 32 0.6× 49 1.2× 55 449
María Carla Galavotti Italy 13 164 1.2× 63 0.5× 55 1.0× 19 0.4× 27 0.6× 39 349
Geoffrey Hunter United Kingdom 6 59 0.4× 74 0.6× 74 1.4× 27 0.5× 50 1.2× 9 243
V. F. Lenzen United States 7 97 0.7× 24 0.2× 29 0.5× 13 0.3× 46 1.1× 19 328

Countries citing papers authored by William H. Hay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William H. Hay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William H. Hay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William H. Hay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William H. Hay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William H. Hay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William H. Hay. The network helps show where William H. Hay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William H. Hay

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William H. Hay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William H. Hay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William H. Hay. William H. Hay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Hay, William H.. (1986). Classical Modern Philosophers. Teaching Philosophy. 9(2). 184–185. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hay, William H.. (1982). From Descartes to Wittgenstein. Teaching Philosophy. 5(4). 321–322. 2 indexed citations
3.
Hay, William H.. (1969). Stoic Use of Logic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 51(2). 145–157. 1 indexed citations
4.
Krikorian, Y. H., William H. Hay, Marcus G. Singer, & Arthur Ε. Murphy. (1965). Reason and the Common Good. Selected Essays of Arthur E. Murphy.. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 25(3). 432–432.
5.
Hay, William H.. (1965). On Green's analysis of teaching. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 4(2). 254–263.
6.
Hay, William H.. (1957). Free-Will and Possibilities. Philosophy of Science. 24(3). 207–214. 1 indexed citations
7.
Hay, William H., et al.. (1957). Justus Lipsius; the Philosophy of Renaissance Stocism.. The Journal of Philosophy. 54(17). 538–538. 15 indexed citations
8.
Hay, William H. & Paul Oskar Kristeller. (1956). The Classics and Renaissance Thought.. The Journal of Philosophy. 53(18). 564–564. 1 indexed citations
9.
Hay, William H.. (1956). Paul Carus: A Case-Study of Philosophy on the Frontier. Journal of the History of Ideas. 17(4). 498–498. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hay, William H.. (1956). On the Nature of Newton's First Law of Motion. The Philosophical Review. 65(1). 95–95. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hay, William H., et al.. (1954). Roger Bacon and His Search for a Universal Science.. The Philosophical Review. 63(1). 116–116. 12 indexed citations
12.
Hay, William H. & Georg Henrik von Wright. (1953). A Treatise on Induction and Probability.. The Journal of Philosophy. 50(25). 782–782. 8 indexed citations
13.
Hay, William H. & Rudolf Carnap. (1953). The Continuum of Inductive Methods.. The Philosophical Review. 62(3). 468–468. 281 indexed citations
14.
Hay, William H., et al.. (1953). Descartes and the Modern Mind.. The Journal of Philosophy. 50(18). 563–563. 2 indexed citations
16.
Hay, William H.. (1952). Professor Carnap and Probability. Philosophy of Science. 19(2). 170–177. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026