William Grey

505 total citations
16 papers, 261 citations indexed

About

William Grey is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, William Grey has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 261 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in William Grey's work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). William Grey is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). William Grey collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. William Grey's co-authors include Dan Shi, Jay Odenbaugh, Stefan Linquist, Mark Colyvan, Paul E. Griffiths, Hugh P. Possingham, Kaan Katırcıoğlu, Guillermo Gallego, Sugato Bagchi and Neil Bergmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology and Society, IBM Systems Journal and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

In The Last Decade

William Grey

15 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
William Grey Australia 8 65 59 44 44 31 16 261
Abed G. Rabbani United States 15 30 0.5× 19 0.3× 17 0.4× 21 0.5× 58 1.9× 32 528
John Kennedy United States 9 35 0.5× 6 0.1× 9 0.2× 38 0.9× 11 0.4× 69 327
Frederick Ferré United States 9 111 1.7× 5 0.1× 32 0.7× 18 0.4× 8 0.3× 40 330
Michael P. Malone United States 10 107 1.6× 8 0.1× 6 0.1× 8 0.2× 14 0.5× 30 248
Henryk Skolimowski United States 7 72 1.1× 3 0.1× 28 0.6× 16 0.4× 12 0.4× 34 250
Glenda H. Eoyang United States 8 33 0.5× 5 0.1× 4 0.1× 44 1.0× 75 2.4× 15 263
Toshiji Kawagoe Japan 9 107 1.6× 11 0.2× 5 0.1× 19 0.4× 155 5.0× 34 430
José Ramos Australia 10 81 1.2× 3 0.1× 5 0.1× 60 1.4× 55 1.8× 38 265
Joshua Introne United States 12 125 1.9× 9 0.2× 12 0.3× 48 1.1× 35 1.1× 23 362
Caterina Marchionni Finland 13 93 1.4× 2 0.0× 5 0.1× 31 0.7× 36 1.2× 40 513

Countries citing papers authored by William Grey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Grey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Grey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Grey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Grey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Grey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Grey. The network helps show where William Grey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Grey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Grey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Grey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Grey. William Grey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Colyvan, Mark, Stefan Linquist, William Grey, et al.. (2009). Philosophical Issues in Ecology: Recent Trends and Future Directions. Ecology and Society. 14(2). 39 indexed citations
2.
Grey, William. (2005). Design constraints for the post-human future. Bioethics News. 24(2). 10–19. 1 indexed citations
3.
Grey, William, et al.. (2005). The role of e-marketplaces in relationship-based supply chains: A survey. IBM Systems Journal. 44(1). 109–123. 58 indexed citations
4.
Bergmann, Neil, et al.. (2003). A Case for Investigating the Ethics of Artificial Life. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1. 276–287. 1 indexed citations
5.
Grey, William, et al.. (2003). An analytic approach for quantifying the value of e-business initiatives. IBM Systems Journal. 42(3). 484–497. 19 indexed citations
6.
Grey, William. (2000). Metaphor and meaning. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 4. 17 indexed citations
7.
Grey, William. (2000). Gasking's proof. Analysis. 60(268). 368–370. 2 indexed citations
8.
Grey, William. (2000). A critique of deep green theory. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 43–58. 2 indexed citations
9.
Grey, William. (1999). Troubles with Time Travel. Philosophy. 74(1). 55–70. 17 indexed citations
10.
Grey, William. (1999). Epicurus and the harm of death. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 77(3). 358–364. 16 indexed citations
11.
Grey, William, et al.. (1997). Time and Becoming. 11(3). 215–220. 4 indexed citations
12.
Grey, William. (1996). Possible Persons and the Problems of Posterity. Environmental Values. 5(2). 161–179. 2 indexed citations
13.
Grey, William. (1996). Possible Persons and the Problems of Posterity. Environmental Values. 5(2). 161–179. 7 indexed citations
14.
Grey, William. (1993). Anthropocentrism and deep ecology. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 71(4). 463–475. 60 indexed citations
15.
Grey, William. (1987). EVOLUTION AND THE MEANING OF LIFE. Zygon®. 22(4). 7 indexed citations
16.
Grey, William. (1986). A Critique of Deep Ecology. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 3(2). 211–216. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026