William Grey

505 citations
16 papers · 261 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

William Grey

15 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

William Grey
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Management Information Systems 59
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
  • History and Philosophy of Science 14
  • Marketing 26
  • Information Systems and Management 19
Replace Frederick Ferré with:
Frederick Ferré United States
Henryk Skolimowski United States
Michael P. Malone United States
John Kennedy United States
Yuk Hui Germany
Geof Bowker France
Abed G. Rabbani United States
Holger H. Herwig Canada
Manuel Arias Maldonado Spain
Cynthia Russett United States
William Grey relative to Frederick Ferré United States Frederick Ferré's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Frederick Ferré · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Grey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Grey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Grey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Grey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Grey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Grey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Grey. The network helps show where William Grey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside William Grey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Grey Line = papers co-authored together William Grey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199360
2 200558
3 200939
4 200319
5 200017
6 199917
7 199916
8 19869
9 19967
10 19877
11 19974
12 20002
13 19962
14
A critique of deep green theory
20002
15
A Case for Investigating the Ethics of Artificial Life
20031
16 20051

About William Grey

William Grey is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Management Information Systems, having authored 16 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (59 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations), Marketing (26 citations) and Information Systems and Management (19 citations). William Grey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Dan Shi, Mark Colyvan, Jay Odenbaugh, Hugh P. Possingham, Stefan Linquist, Paul E. Griffiths, Kaan Katırcıoğlu, Sugato Bagchi, Guillermo Gallego and Neil Bergmann. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, IBM Systems Journal, Environmental Values, Zygon® and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact