William Goodman
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jutta M. Wolf (4 shared papers)Johanna Janson (1 shared paper)Rebecca J. Beeken (16 shared papers)Gill Hubbard (11 shared papers)Claire Taylor (7 shared papers)Ethna McFerran (2 shared papers)Richard Purves (2 shared papers)Silje Steinsbekk (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (2 papers)BMJ Open Gastroenterology (1 paper)Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)JMIR Serious Games (1 paper)Cancer Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
William Goodman
25 papers receiving 469 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Behavioral Neuroscience 128
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 94
- Clinical Psychology 133
- Biological Psychiatry 15
- Applied Psychology 30
Countries citing papers authored by William Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of William Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Goodman. The network helps show where William Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 207 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 4 | Cyber Deterrence: Tougher in Theory than in Practice? | 2010 | 28 |
| 5 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 1 |
About William Goodman
William Goodman is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and General Health Professions, having authored 28 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stoma care and complications (11 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies (2 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (2 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (128 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations), Clinical Psychology (133 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations) and Applied Psychology (30 citations). William Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jutta M. Wolf, Johanna Janson, Rebecca J. Beeken, Gill Hubbard, Claire Taylor, Ethna McFerran, Richard Purves, Silje Steinsbekk, Claudia Hunot‐Alexander and Matthew Allsop. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, BMJ Open Gastroenterology, Frontiers in Psychology, JMIR Serious Games and Cancer Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.