William G. Pitt
- Biomedical Engineering top 0.5%
- Biomaterials top 0.2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 2%
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Ghaleb A. HusseiniNatalya RapoportRichard D. SagersDouglas A. ChristensenSamir A. RossS. L. CooperJared L. NelsonBrian R. Young
- Topics
- Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (46 papers)Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (39 papers)Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (32 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Arab EmiratesMalaysia
In The Last Decade
William G. Pitt
180 papers receiving 7.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 172
- Biomedical Engineering 4.0k
- Biomaterials 2.3k
- Molecular Biology 2.0k
- Materials Chemistry 1.8k
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 782
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Pitt
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Pitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Pitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Pitt. The network helps show where William G. Pitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Pitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Pitt. William G. Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scaffold-based 3D cell culture models in cancer researchbreakdown → | 122 |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 49 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | Removal of oral biofilm by sonic phenomena. | 27 |
| 15 | 144 | |
| 16 | 79 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 102 | |
| 19 | 100 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About William G. Pitt
William G. Pitt is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Architecture, having authored 183 papers that have together received 8.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (46 papers), Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena (39 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (32 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (2.3k citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (782 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (4.0k citations). William G. Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Ghaleb A. Husseini, Natalya Rapoport, Richard D. Sagers, Douglas A. Christensen, Samir A. Ross, S. L. Cooper, Jared L. Nelson, Brian R. Young, Nahid S. Awad and Waad H. Abuwatfa. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews and Journal of The Electrochemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.