Stuart L. Cooper

5.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
91 papers, 4.1k citations indexed

About

Stuart L. Cooper is a scholar working on Surfaces, Coatings and Films, Organic Chemistry and Polymers and Plastics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart L. Cooper has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 4.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Surfaces, Coatings and Films, 21 papers in Organic Chemistry and 20 papers in Polymers and Plastics. Recurrent topics in Stuart L. Cooper's work include Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (36 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (15 papers) and Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (9 papers). Stuart L. Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (36 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (15 papers) and Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (9 papers). Stuart L. Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and Belgium. Stuart L. Cooper's co-authors include R. W. Seymour, Michael D. Lelah, Timothy G. Grasel, Sachin Velankar, Linda K. Lambrecht, Kinam Park, James H. Silver, Deane F. Mosher, Jui‐Che Lin and Horng‐Ban Lin and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Biomaterials and Macromolecules.

In The Last Decade

Stuart L. Cooper

91 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

Thermal Analysis of Polyurethane Block Polymers 1973 2026 1990 2008 1973 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart L. Cooper United States 36 1.7k 1.1k 1.1k 867 769 91 4.1k
Y. Ikada Japan 40 1.5k 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 3.2k 3.0× 628 0.7× 2.0k 2.6× 112 6.6k
Ging‐Ho Hsiue Taiwan 44 2.2k 1.2× 822 0.7× 1.5k 1.4× 1.3k 1.5× 1.2k 1.6× 201 6.3k
S. L. Cooper United States 27 947 0.5× 595 0.5× 471 0.4× 441 0.5× 488 0.6× 63 2.7k
J. Paul Santerre Canada 46 908 0.5× 614 0.5× 1.9k 1.8× 942 1.1× 1.6k 2.0× 129 6.4k
Pathiraja A. Gunatillake Australia 33 2.0k 1.2× 314 0.3× 1.6k 1.5× 945 1.1× 1.4k 1.8× 79 4.4k
J. Feijen Netherlands 26 745 0.4× 500 0.4× 2.0k 1.9× 467 0.5× 1.6k 2.1× 56 4.0k
Anne Hiltner United States 47 2.7k 1.5× 411 0.4× 1.9k 1.8× 692 0.8× 1.9k 2.5× 119 6.0k
Heather Sheardown Canada 46 442 0.3× 1.7k 1.5× 1.7k 1.6× 785 0.9× 1.7k 2.2× 185 6.6k
Shifang Luan China 40 524 0.3× 1.3k 1.2× 1.2k 1.1× 1.4k 1.6× 1.7k 2.2× 172 4.7k
Christopher A. Siedlecki United States 36 438 0.3× 1.4k 1.2× 1.1k 1.0× 424 0.5× 1.7k 2.2× 102 4.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart L. Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart L. Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart L. Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart L. Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart L. Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart L. Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart L. Cooper. The network helps show where Stuart L. Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart L. Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart L. Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart L. Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart L. Cooper. Stuart L. Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Khan, Saad A., et al.. (2005). Oxidative and hydrolytic stability of a novel acrylic terpolymer for biomedical applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 74A(1). 117–123. 13 indexed citations
2.
Fussell, Garland & Stuart L. Cooper. (2004). Endothelial cell adhesion on RGD‐containing methacrylate terpolymers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 70A(2). 265–273. 28 indexed citations
3.
Cooper, Stuart L., et al.. (2001). Synthesis and characterization of non-leaching biocidal polyurethanes. Biomaterials. 22(16). 2239–2246. 83 indexed citations
4.
Yung, Lin‐Yue Lanry, F. Lim, Mohammad M. Khan, et al.. (2000). High-molecular-weight kininogen preadsorbed to glass surface markedly reduces neutrophil adhesion. Biomaterials. 21(4). 405–414. 10 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, Stuart L., et al.. (2000). Leukocyte adhesion on model surfaces under flow: Effects of surface chemistry, protein adsorption, and shear rate. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 50(3). 291–301. 89 indexed citations
6.
Proctor, Richard A., et al.. (1999). Bacterial adhesion to functionalized polyurethanes. Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition. 10(6). 679–697. 21 indexed citations
8.
Cooper, Stuart L., et al.. (1998). Influence of thrombus components in mediatingstaphylococcus aureus adhesion to polyurethane surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 40(4). 660–670. 44 indexed citations
9.
Cooper, Stuart L., et al.. (1996). Bacterial Adhesion on Polyurethane Surfaces Conditioned With Thrombus Components. ASAIO Journal. 42(5). M476–479. 26 indexed citations
10.
Hergenrother, Robert W., et al.. (1994). Blood-contacting properties of polydimethylsiloxane polyureaurethanes. Biomaterials. 15(8). 635–640. 54 indexed citations
11.
Pitt, William G., et al.. (1993). Fibronectin adsorpton kinetics on phase segregated polyurethaneureas. Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition. 4(4). 337–346. 7 indexed citations
12.
Silver, James H., et al.. (1993). Effect of polyol type on the physical properties and thrombogenicity of sulfonate‐containing polyurethanes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 27(11). 1443–1457. 42 indexed citations
13.
Lin, Horng‐Ban, et al.. (1993). Surface properties of RGD-peptide grafted polyurethane block copolymers: Variable take-off angle and cold-stage ESCA studies. Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition. 4(3). 183–198. 30 indexed citations
14.
Silver, James H., et al.. (1993). Effect of polyol type on the surface structure of sulfonate‐containing polyurethanes. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 27(6). 735–745. 31 indexed citations
15.
Silver, James H., Horng‐Ban Lin, & Stuart L. Cooper. (1993). Effect of protein adsorption on the blood-contacting response of sulphonated polyurethanes. Biomaterials. 14(11). 834–844. 14 indexed citations
16.
Silver, James H., Arlene P. Hart, Eliot C. Williams, et al.. (1992). Anticoagulant effects of sulphonated polyurethanes. Biomaterials. 13(6). 339–344. 83 indexed citations
17.
Akutsu, Tetsuzo, Hitoshi Koyanagi, Setsuo Takatani, et al.. (1988). Artificial Heart 2. 9 indexed citations
18.
Grasel, Timothy G., et al.. (1987). Properties of extruded poly(tetramethylene oxide) Polyurethane block copolymers for blood-contacting applications. Biomaterials. 8(5). 329–340. 16 indexed citations
19.
Collins, William E., et al.. (1987). A Preliminary Comparison of the Thrombogenic Activity of Vitronectin and Other RGD‐containing Proteins When Bound to Surfacesa. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 516(1). 291–299. 26 indexed citations
20.
Cooper, Stuart L. & G. M. Estes. (1979). Multiphase polymers : based on a symposium sponsored by the Division of Polymer Chemistry at the 175th meeting of the American Chemical Society, Anaheim, California, March 13-15, 1978. American Chemical Society eBooks. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026