William G. Kramer

113 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

William G. Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Transplantation 115
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 146
  • Pharmacology 384
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 514
  • Pharmacology 185
Replace Flávio Reis with:
Flávio Reis Portugal
Paul L. McCormack New Zealand
Sebastian Harder Germany
Kenneth C. Lasseter United States
Eugen Faist Germany
Robert A. Blum United States
David R. Luke United States
Frieder Kees Germany
Gregory B. Bulkley United States
Walter K. Kraft United States
William G. Kramer relative to Flávio Reis Portugal Flávio Reis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Flávio Reis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William G. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Kramer. The network helps show where William G. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William G. Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William G. Kramer Line = papers co-authored together William G. Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202311
2 20197
3 20177
4 20160
5 201515
6 20159
7 201452
8 2012173
9 201013
10 200917
11 199639
12 199418
13 199437
14 199351
15
Pharmacokinetics of torsemide in chronic renal insufficiency
19912
16
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dilevalol alone and with cimetidine
19894
17 19893
18 19895
19 198027
20
High dose pharmacokinetics of meperidine in surgical patients
19786

About William G. Kramer

William G. Kramer is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Transplantation, Analytical Chemistry, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 117 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (26 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (13 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (13 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (8 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (8 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (8 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (7 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (115 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (146 citations), Pharmacology (384 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (514 citations) and Pharmacology (185 citations). William G. Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include D. Craig Brater, Barry D. Kahan, Paula Black, William B. Smith, Dennis Vargo, Admir Hadžić, Neil Singla, Erol Onel, Sheldon L. Kaplan and Ryotaro Azuma. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Blood and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026