William G. Boltz
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Françoise BottéroJohn DeFrancisDavid N. KeightleyYakov MalkielMatthias SchemmelRafe de CrespignyChad HansenJürgen Renn
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (20 papers)Japanese History and Culture (4 papers)Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
William G. Boltz
27 papers receiving 164 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Sociology and Political Science 121
- Language and Linguistics 47
- Cultural Studies 45
- Anthropology 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by William G. Boltz
This map shows the geographic impact of William G. Boltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William G. Boltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William G. Boltz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William G. Boltz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William G. Boltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William G. Boltz. The network helps show where William G. Boltz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William G. Boltz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William G. Boltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William G. Boltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William G. Boltz. William G. Boltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Mechanics in the Mohist Canon and Its European Counterpart: Texts and Contexts | 2 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Monosyllabicity and the Origin of the Chinese Script | 5 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About William G. Boltz
William G. Boltz is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (20 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (6 citations), Cultural Studies (45 citations) and Language and Linguistics (47 citations). William G. Boltz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Françoise Bottéro, John DeFrancis, David N. Keightley, Yakov Malkiel, Matthias Schemmel, Rafe de Crespigny, Chad Hansen, Jürgen Renn, Paul W. Kroll and David R. Knechtges. Their work appears in journals such as World Archaeology, Journal of the American Oriental Society and Early China.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.