I. J. Gelb
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Paleontology top 10%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- E. A. SpeiserThorkild JacobsenA. Leo OppenheimBenno LandsbergerPiotr SteinkellerRobert WhitingDavid DiringerClaude F.-A. Schaeffer
- Topics
- Ancient Near East History (29 papers)Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (14 papers)Linguistics and language evolution (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRomania
In The Last Decade
I. J. Gelb
37 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Archeology 316
- Language and Linguistics 127
- Anthropology 102
- Paleontology 63
- Religious studies 60
Countries citing papers authored by I. J. Gelb
This map shows the geographic impact of I. J. Gelb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. J. Gelb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. J. Gelb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. J. Gelb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. J. Gelb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. J. Gelb. The network helps show where I. J. Gelb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. J. Gelb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. J. Gelb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. J. Gelb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. J. Gelb. I. J. Gelb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparative Method in the Study of the Society and Economy of the Ancient Near East | 1 |
| 2 | Homo Ludens in Early Mesopotamia | 1 |
| 3 | The Inscription of Jibbiṭ-Lîm, King of Ebla | 1 |
| 4 | The Language of Ebla in the Light of the Sources from Ebla, Mari, and Babylonia | 1 |
| 5 | Computer-aided analysis of Amorite | 12 |
| 6 | Definition and Discussion of Slavery and Serfdom | 4 |
| 7 | Syro-Mesopotamian studies, a preface . Thoughts about Ibla : a preliminary evaluation, March 1977 | 2 |
| 8 | Pour une théorie de l'écriture | 3 |
| 9 | Sequential reconstruction of Proto-Akkadian | 8 |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Von der Keilschrift zum Alphabet : Grundlagen einer Schriftwissenschaft | 0 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 133 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | Sargonic texts from the Diyala region | 5 |
About I. J. Gelb
I. J. Gelb is a scholar working on Archeology, Language and Linguistics and Anthropology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ancient Near East History (29 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (14 papers) and Linguistics and language evolution (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (316 citations), Language and Linguistics (127 citations) and Religious studies (60 citations). I. J. Gelb has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include E. A. Speiser, Thorkild Jacobsen, A. Leo Oppenheim, Benno Landsberger, Piotr Steinkeller, Robert Whiting, David Diringer, Claude F.-A. Schaeffer, Herbert H. Paper and Musée du Louvre. Their work appears in journals such as Language, The American Historical Review and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.