William Fairbairn

152 total papers · 4.7k total citations
17 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

William Fairbairn is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, William Fairbairn has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in William Fairbairn's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). William Fairbairn is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (2 papers). William Fairbairn collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. William Fairbairn's co-authors include Ernest Jones and David E. Scharff and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Sociology, Technology and Culture and The Economic History Review.

In The Last Decade

William Fairbairn

15 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Psychoanalytic Studies of... 1953 2026 1977 2001 1953 1954 250 500 750

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
William Fairbairn 1.5k 475 292 245 184 17 2.0k
Hans W. Loewald 1.4k 0.9× 309 0.7× 292 1.0× 339 1.4× 162 0.9× 35 2.0k
Ernest Jones 1.2k 0.8× 384 0.8× 302 1.0× 365 1.5× 218 1.2× 53 2.1k
Alexander C. Morgan 1.3k 0.9× 595 1.3× 228 0.8× 215 0.9× 69 0.4× 23 1.7k
Harry Stack Sullivan 1.3k 0.9× 598 1.3× 288 1.0× 220 0.9× 274 1.5× 22 2.0k
Ralph R. Greenson 1.6k 1.1× 631 1.3× 139 0.5× 229 0.9× 156 0.8× 33 2.2k
Wilfred R. Bion 1.7k 1.1× 485 1.0× 424 1.5× 325 1.3× 379 2.1× 52 2.6k
Jeremy P. Nahum 1.4k 1.0× 664 1.4× 241 0.8× 225 0.9× 72 0.4× 31 1.8k
Fred Pine 1.4k 0.9× 550 1.2× 163 0.6× 181 0.7× 240 1.3× 55 2.0k
Melanie Klein 1.8k 1.2× 538 1.1× 372 1.3× 205 0.8× 564 3.1× 50 3.2k
H. F. Ellenberger 876 0.6× 351 0.7× 516 1.8× 346 1.4× 151 0.8× 44 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by William Fairbairn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Fairbairn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Fairbairn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Fairbairn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Fairbairn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Fairbairn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Fairbairn. The network helps show where William Fairbairn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Fairbairn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Fairbairn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Fairbairn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William Fairbairn. William Fairbairn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026