William F. Garrett
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 1
-
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques 4
-
- Augmented Reality Applications 2
- Geology top 10%
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
-
- Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging 5
-
- AI in cancer detection 4
-
- 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis 3
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 2
-
- Geological Modeling and Analysis 2
- Co-authors
- Andrei StateGentaro HirotaMark LivingstonDavid ChenMary C. WhittonHenry FuchsEtta D. PisanoSubodh Kumar
- Cited by
- Human-Computer InteractionComputer Graphics and Computer-Aided DesignComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Journals
- Academic Radiology (2 papers)Computers & Graphics (1 paper)Journal of Digital Imaging (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William F. Garrett
10 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Human-Computer Interaction 188
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 73
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 401
- Geology 59
- Aerospace Engineering 165
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Garrett
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Garrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Garrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Garrett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Garrett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Garrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Garrett. The network helps show where William F. Garrett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 15 scholars most cited alongside William F. Garrett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 17 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 6 | Virtual environments technology to aid needle biopsies of the breast. An example of real-time data fusion. | 1996 | 6 |
| 7 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 175 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 239 |
About William F. Garrett
William F. Garrett is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Geochemistry and Petrology, Human-Computer Interaction, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Computational Mechanics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (5 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers), 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Geological Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers) and Interactive and Immersive Displays (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (188 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (73 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (401 citations), Geology (59 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (165 citations). William F. Garrett has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrei State, Gentaro Hirota, Mark Livingston, David Chen, Mary C. Whitton, Henry Fuchs, Etta D. Pisano, Subodh Kumar, Dinesh Manocha and Ming–Chieh Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Radiology, Computers & Graphics, Journal of Digital Imaging, Breast Disease and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.