William F. Bowlin
- Management Science and Operations Research top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Herbert ShermanIndranil R. BardhanToshiyuki SueyoshiW. W. CooperDavid N. HerdaJanet M. RivesS. Alexander ReedJames Clifton
- Topics
- Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (11 papers)Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (4 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Management Science and Operations ResearchEconomics and EconometricsManagement Information Systems
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
William F. Bowlin
24 papers receiving 744 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Management Science and Operations Research 620
- Economics and Econometrics 396
- Strategy and Management 120
- Management Information Systems 98
- Control and Systems Engineering 97
Countries citing papers authored by William F. Bowlin
This map shows the geographic impact of William F. Bowlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William F. Bowlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William F. Bowlin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William F. Bowlin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William F. Bowlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William F. Bowlin. The network helps show where William F. Bowlin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William F. Bowlin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William F. Bowlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William F. Bowlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William F. Bowlin. William F. Bowlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 305 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 81 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | A data envelopment analysis approach to performance evaluation in not-for-profit entities with an illustrative application to the U.S. Air Force | 5 |
About William F. Bowlin
William F. Bowlin is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (11 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (4 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (620 citations), Economics and Econometrics (396 citations) and Management Information Systems (98 citations). William F. Bowlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Sherman, Indranil R. Bardhan, Toshiyuki Sueyoshi, W. W. Cooper, David N. Herda, Janet M. Rives, S. Alexander Reed, James Clifton and Herbert Snyder. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of the Operational Research Society and Omega.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.