William E. Trout

36 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

William E. Trout
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Aging 74
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 357
  • Small Animals 202
  • Animal Science and Zoology 210
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 263
Replace A. Iritani with:
A. Iritani Japan
W. H. McShan United States
R. G. WALES Australia
J.A. Proudman United States
V. Carcangiu Italy
Petr Šimeček Czechia
Xavier Vignon France
P. MAULÉON France
M. F. Allan United States
Bernadette Delaleu France
William E. Trout relative to A. Iritani Japan A. Iritani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
A. Iritani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Trout

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Trout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Trout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Trout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Trout

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Trout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Trout. The network helps show where William E. Trout may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Trout, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Trout Line = papers co-authored together William E. Trout links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1969239
2 201684
3 201775
4 197073
5 201961
6 199860
7
Embryo-uterine interactions in pigs during week 2 of pregnancy.
199356
8 199245
9 198345
10 199044
11 199142
12 199230
13 197423
14 199022
15 197319
16 198718
17 199418
18
Stimulation of food intake and growth of swine by cholecystokinin immunization.
199018
19 198416
20 199314

About William E. Trout

William E. Trout is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (15 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (74 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (357 citations), Small Animals (202 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (210 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (263 citations). William E. Trout has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William D. Kaplan, R. Michael Roberts, R. Michael Roberts, R. K. Christenson, B. D. Schanbacher, Sancai Xie, Melody Stallings‐Mann, Harold G. Klemcke, Jerome C. Pekas and J. L. Vallet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Genetics, Endocrinology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Animal Reproduction Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact