J. J. Ford

4.7k total citations
126 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

J. J. Ford is a scholar working on Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, J. J. Ford has authored 126 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Genetics, 46 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 39 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in J. J. Ford's work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (46 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (42 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (38 papers). J. J. Ford is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (46 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (42 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (38 papers). J. J. Ford collaborates with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Australia. J. J. Ford's co-authors include R. K. Christenson, D. D. Lunstra, T. Wise, B. D. Schanbacher, G. A. Rohrer, S. E. Echternkamp, S. A. McCoard, H. J. Howard, Alan J. Conley and J. Klindt and has published in prestigious journals such as Genetics, Radiology and Endocrinology.

In The Last Decade

J. J. Ford

123 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J. J. Ford United States 37 1.6k 1.2k 1.2k 823 680 126 3.8k
M. G. Hunter United Kingdom 33 1.0k 0.6× 702 0.6× 1.7k 1.4× 1.3k 1.6× 530 0.8× 119 3.3k
M. Terqui France 33 1.2k 0.7× 815 0.7× 1.3k 1.1× 1.1k 1.4× 425 0.6× 113 3.1k
Terry M. Nett United States 46 1.8k 1.1× 2.2k 1.8× 2.6k 2.2× 1.0k 1.3× 424 0.6× 164 5.5k
B. D. Schanbacher United States 32 1.1k 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 1.7k 1.4× 430 0.5× 608 0.9× 129 3.4k
Bruce D. Murphy Canada 42 1.6k 1.0× 1.3k 1.0× 2.0k 1.7× 2.0k 2.4× 371 0.5× 212 6.2k
R. K. Christenson United States 38 1.4k 0.9× 434 0.3× 1.7k 1.4× 641 0.8× 1.0k 1.5× 154 4.0k
Rina Meidan Israel 37 1.3k 0.8× 778 0.6× 2.7k 2.3× 936 1.1× 286 0.4× 114 4.5k
Adam J. Ziȩcik Poland 32 919 0.6× 802 0.6× 2.0k 1.7× 840 1.0× 532 0.8× 165 3.3k
Lloyd L. Anderson United States 28 1.0k 0.6× 333 0.3× 1.4k 1.2× 766 0.9× 453 0.7× 144 3.3k
Janice M. Bahr United States 41 2.3k 1.4× 2.2k 1.8× 841 0.7× 1.1k 1.3× 173 0.3× 172 6.0k

Countries citing papers authored by J. J. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. J. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. J. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. J. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. J. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. J. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. J. Ford. The network helps show where J. J. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. J. Ford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. J. Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. J. Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. J. Ford. J. J. Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lents, Clay A, et al.. (2008). Central and peripheral administration of kisspeptin activates gonadotropin but not somatotropin secretion in prepubertal gilts. Reproduction. 135(6). 879–887. 96 indexed citations
2.
Nonneman, Dan, T. Wise, J. J. Ford, L. A. Kuehn, & G. A. Rohrer. (2006). Characterization of the aldo-keto reductase 1C gene cluster on pig chromosome 10: possible associations with reproductive traits.. BMC Veterinary Research. 2(1). 28–28. 25 indexed citations
3.
McCoard, S. A., et al.. (2003). Endocrine and molecular influences on testicular development in Meishan and White Composite boars. Journal of Endocrinology. 178(3). 405–416. 22 indexed citations
4.
Corbin, C. Jo, Francisco Moran, Justin D. Vidal, et al.. (2003). Biochemical Assessment of Limits to Estrogen Synthesis in Porcine Follicles1. Biology of Reproduction. 69(2). 390–397. 39 indexed citations
5.
McCoard, S. A., T. Wise, D. D. Lunstra, & J. J. Ford. (2003). Stereological evaluation of Sertoli cell ontogeny during fetal and neonatal life in two diverse breeds of swine. Journal of Endocrinology. 178(3). 395–403. 46 indexed citations
6.
Crichton, Elizabeth G., Elliott Bedows, Amanda K. Lindholm‐Perry, et al.. (2003). Efficacy of Porcine Gonadotropins for Repeated Stimulation of Ovarian Activity for Oocyte Retrieval and In Vitro Embryo Production and Cryopreservation in Siberian Tigers (Panthera tigris altaica)1. Biology of Reproduction. 68(1). 105–113. 38 indexed citations
8.
McCoard, S. A., et al.. (2001). Temporal and Spatial Localization Patterns of Gata4 During Porcine Gonadogenesis1. Biology of Reproduction. 65(2). 366–374. 56 indexed citations
9.
Ford, J. J., T. Wise, D. D. Lunstra, & G. A. Rohrer. (2001). Interrelationships of Porcine X and Y Chromosomes with Pituitary Gonadotropins and Testicular Size1. Biology of Reproduction. 65(3). 906–912. 36 indexed citations
10.
Ford, J. J., D. R. Zimmerman, T. Wise, K. A. Leymaster, & R. K. Christenson. (2001). Increased plasma follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations in prepubertal gilts from lines selected for increased number of corpora lutea.. Journal of Animal Science. 79(7). 1877–1877. 13 indexed citations
12.
Rohrer, G. A., et al.. (2000). Identification and characterization of a new allele for the beta subunit of follicle‐stimulating hormone in Chinese pig breeds*. Animal Genetics. 31(1). 28–31. 8 indexed citations
13.
Wise, T., Eraldo Lourenso Zanella, D. D. Lunstra, & J. J. Ford. (2000). Relationships of gonadotropins, testosterone, and cortisol in response to GnRH and GnRH antagonist in boars selected for high and low follicle-stimulating hormone levels.. Journal of Animal Science. 78(6). 1577–1577. 16 indexed citations
14.
15.
Wise, T. & J. J. Ford. (1998). Relationships of liver weight, cholesterol, albumin and α2-macroglobulin concentrations with ovarian function in swine. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 67(5-6). 383–390.
16.
Conley, Alan J., C. Jo Corbin, Margaret M. Hinshelwood, et al.. (1996). Functional Aromatase Expression in Porcine Adrenal Gland and Testis1. Biology of Reproduction. 54(2). 497–505. 91 indexed citations
17.
Wise, T., G. J. Macdonald, J. Klindt, & J. J. Ford. (1992). Characterization of thymic weight and thymic peptide thymosin-beta 4: effects of hypophysectomy, sex, and neonatal sexual differentiation.. PubMed. 19(4). 235–44. 6 indexed citations
18.
Borg, Kurt E., et al.. (1992). Effects of sexual experience, season, and mating stimuli on endocrine concentrations in the adult ram. Hormones and Behavior. 26(1). 87–109. 43 indexed citations
19.
Anderson, Lloyd L., et al.. (1991). Growth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion in Hypophysial Stalk-Transected Pigs as Affected by Growth Hormone and Prolactin-Releasing and Inhibiting Factors. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 196(2). 194–202. 24 indexed citations
20.
Jenkins, T. G., J. J. Ford, & J. Klindt. (1988). Postweaning Growth, Feed Efficiency and Chemical Composition of Sheep as Affected by Prenatal and Postnatal Testosterone. Journal of Animal Science. 66(5). 1179–1179. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026