William E. Edmonston
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Neurology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Co-authors
- Thomas S. RobertsonJohn A. SternGeorge A. UlettJohn F. KihlstromRichard M. GriffithRobert RosenthalPeter W. SheehanR. Lundy
- Topics
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect (24 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (9 papers)Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William E. Edmonston
35 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Cognitive Neuroscience 422
- General Psychology 161
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Neurology 63
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Edmonston
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Edmonston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Edmonston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Edmonston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Edmonston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Edmonston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Edmonston. The network helps show where William E. Edmonston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Edmonston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Edmonston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Edmonston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Edmonston. William E. Edmonston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suggestion and Suggestibility: Theory and Research | 17 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | Hypnosis and relaxation : modern verification of an old equation | 63 |
| 5 | Conceptual and investigative approaches to hypnosis and hypnotic phenomena. | 46 |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About William E. Edmonston
William E. Edmonston is a scholar working on General Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (24 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (9 papers) and Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (161 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (422 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). William E. Edmonston has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas S. Robertson, John A. Stern, George A. Ulett, John F. Kihlstrom, Richard M. Griffith, Robert Rosenthal, Peter W. Sheehan, R. Lundy, H. J. Eysenck and Petra Netter. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.