William E. Dyer
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Seed Germination and Physiology
- Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Pollution top 5%
- Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
Papers in
-
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 26
- Seed Germination and Physiology 10
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 7
- Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions 4
- Pollution 14
- Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies 13
- Co-authors
- Ahmed BahieldinKlaus M. HerrmannRongda QuElumalai SivamaniTuan‐Hua David HoThamir S. Al‐NiemiJon M. WraithPeter K. Fay
- Journals
- Weed Science (10 papers)Plant Science (4 papers)Weed Research (3 papers)Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology (3 papers)Physiologia Plantarum (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgyptPoland
In The Last Decade
William E. Dyer
57 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Plant Science 1.7k
- Pollution 314
- Agronomy and Crop Science 187
- Biotechnology 135
- Molecular Biology 867
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Dyer
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Dyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Dyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Dyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Dyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Dyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Dyer. The network helps show where William E. Dyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Dyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 105 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 32 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 52 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 26 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 76 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 35 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 51 |
About William E. Dyer
William E. Dyer is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pollution, Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (26 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (23 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (13 papers), Seed Germination and Physiology (10 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (7 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (4 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (4 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.7k citations), Pollution (314 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (187 citations), Biotechnology (135 citations) and Molecular Biology (867 citations). William E. Dyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Ahmed Bahieldin, Klaus M. Herrmann, Rongda Qu, Elumalai Sivamani, Tuan‐Hua David Ho, Thamir S. Al‐Niemi, Jon M. Wraith, Peter K. Fay, Stephen C. Weller and Bruce D. Maxwell. Their work appears in journals such as Weed Science, Plant Science, Weed Research, Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology and Physiologia Plantarum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.