William E. Curtis

954 citations
15 papers · 752 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

William E. Curtis

15 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

William E. Curtis
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 236
  • Surgery 442
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 158
  • Developmental Neuroscience 32
  • Biochemistry 45
Replace C. J. Preuße with:
C. J. Preuße Germany
Thomas N. Masters United States
Olav F Münter Sellevold Norway
Bernard Hausen Germany
Robert S. Poston United States
M Laude France
Yoshinori Nakamura Japan
Wim Stooker Netherlands
Jean-Pierre Bertinchant France
Judy A. Walton United States
William E. Curtis relative to C. J. Preuße Germany C. J. Preuße's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
C. J. Preuße · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William E. Curtis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Curtis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Curtis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Curtis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Curtis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Curtis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Curtis. The network helps show where William E. Curtis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside William E. Curtis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William E. Curtis Line = papers co-authored together William E. Curtis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2002136
2 19973
3 19972
4 1996126
5 199485
6 199325
7 199365
8 199334
9 199343
10 199342
11
Inhibition of neutrophil adherence improves postischemic ventricular performance of the neonatal heart.
199349
12 199234
13 198847
14 198552
15 19699

About William E. Curtis

William E. Curtis is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Biochemistry, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 752 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (7 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (2 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (236 citations), Surgery (442 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (158 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (32 citations) and Biochemistry (45 citations). William E. Curtis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Duke E. Cameron, William A. Baumgartner, Timothy J. Gardner, A. Marc Gillinov, A. Marc Gillinov, Ian C. Wilson, Ronald M. Burch, Rinoo V. Shah, Peter S. Greene and R. Scott Stuart. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Symposium (International) on Combustion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026