William E. Beane
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- G. William LuckerRobert L. HelmreichKaren A. MatthewsJanet T. SpenceWalter G. StephanKenneth E. GuireJames H. Korn
- Topics
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers)Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Educational PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William E. Beane
9 papers receiving 395 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Social Psychology 135
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
- Clinical Psychology 68
- Applied Psychology 63
- Sociology and Political Science 60
Countries citing papers authored by William E. Beane
This map shows the geographic impact of William E. Beane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William E. Beane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William E. Beane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William E. Beane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William E. Beane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William E. Beane. The network helps show where William E. Beane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William E. Beane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William E. Beane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William E. Beane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William E. Beane. William E. Beane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 58 | |
| 5 | 197 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | The effects of belief similarity and ethnicity on liking and attributions for performance | 5 |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 26 |
About William E. Beane
William E. Beane is a scholar working on General Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (32 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations). William E. Beane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include G. William Lucker, Robert L. Helmreich, Karen A. Matthews, Janet T. Spence, Walter G. Stephan, Kenneth E. Guire and James H. Korn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Educational Psychology and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.